Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubred v. Control Data Corp., 442 N.W.2d 308.
- Wirth v. M.A. Mortenson/Shal Associates 520 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 519 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Time Insurance Co. v. Opus Corp. 519 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Time Insurance Co. v. Opus Corp. 519 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Baker Investments Ltd. v. City of Minneapolis 519 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Baker Investments Ltd. v. City of Minneapolis 519 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Walker v. Scott County 518 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Walker v. Scott County 518 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Johannessen 516 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- GME Consultants, Inc. v. Oak Grove Development, Inc. 515 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- GME Consultants, Inc. v. Oak Grove Development, Inc. 515 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Kemmerer v. State Farm Insurance Companies 513 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Kemmerer v. State Farm Insurance Companies 513 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Unke v. Independent School District No. 147 510 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Unke v. Independent School District No. 147 510 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Hertzberg 511 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Hertzberg 511 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Hyland v. State 509 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Hyland v. State 509 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Haavisto v. Perpich 498 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Haavisto v. Perpich 498 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- S.L.D. v. Kranz 498 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- S.L.D. v. Kranz 498 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Host v. Host 497 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Host v. Host
497 N.W.2d 617
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank, ().
- Carradine v. State 494 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Carradine v. State 494 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Leubner v. Sterner 483 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Leubner v. Sterner 483 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Pletan v. Gaines 481 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Pletan v. Gaines 481 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Milbank Insurance Co. v. B.L.G. 484 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Milbank Insurance Co. v. B.L.G.
484 N.W.2d 52
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The reviewing court on appeal from a summary judgment looks at “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in its application of the law.”
- IXI Laboratories, Inc. v. First Bank National Ass'n 483 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- IXI Laboratories, Inc. v. First Bank National Ass'n 483 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. Seefeld 481 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1992
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. Seefeld 481 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1992
- Sylvester Bros. Development Co. v. Great Central Insurance Co. 480 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Sylvester Bros. Development Co. v. Great Central Insurance Co. 480 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Carlson v. Hennepin County 479 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1992
-
Carlson v. Hennepin County
479 N.W.2d 50
Minn. 1992
“On appeal from a summary judgment the reviewing court determines whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in its application of the law.”
- NW BY JW v. Anderson 478 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- NW BY JW v. Anderson 478 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Carlson-Grefe Construction, Inc. v. Rosemount Condominium Group Partnership 474 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- O'Reilly v. Allstate Insurance Co. 474 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- White v. Winona State University 474 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
O'Reilly v. Allstate Insurance Co.
474 N.W.2d 221
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(ambiguities in insurance policy must be construed in favor of the insured).
- Carlson-Grefe Construction, Inc. v. Rosemount Condominium Group Partnership 474 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
White v. Winona State University
474 N.W.2d 410
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
ANALYSIS On appeal from a summary judgment, the reviewing court must determine “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in its application of the law.”
- Denike v. WESTERN NAT. MUT. INS. CO. 473 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1991