Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services, 442 N.W.2d 786.

69 citing documents.

In re Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing 924 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing 924 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Appeal of Krenik 903 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 2017
Appeal of Krenik 903 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 2017
In general, we have described a local governmental entity’s decision as arbitrary and capricious if it reflects its will rather than its judgment, Rochester City Lines, or when a decision is “based on whim or is devoid of articulated reasons,” Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
Robert Atkinson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Minn. Stat. § 14.63 (2016) ; Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Servs., Kaplan v. Washington Cty.
John D. Perschbacher, Relator (A15-0619), (A15-2002) v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, A15-619 883 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John D. Perschbacher, Relator (A15-0619), (A15-2002) v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, A15-619 883 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
& Gas Utils., see also Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Servs., (stating that a “decision may be arbitrary or capricious if the decision is based on whim or is devoid of articulated reasons”).
Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education 844 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education 844 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Additionally, “when the meaning of a statute is doubtful, courts should give great weight to a construction placed upon it by the Department charged with its administration.” Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Servs., (quotation omitted).
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 832 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2013
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 832 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2013
Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'N 778 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2010
Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'N 778 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2010
See Wohlsol, 2005 WL 2972997 , at *6; see also Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Servs., (stating that “ ‘[w]hen the meaning of a statute is doubtful, courts should give great weight to a construction placed upon it by the Department charged with its administration’ ” (quoting Krumm v. R.A.
In Re Brittain 705 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Brittain 705 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Health 705 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Health 705 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
See Mammenga v. State Dept, of Human Services
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Mammenga v. State, Dept. of Human Servs.
Moreno v. City of Minneapolis 676 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Moreno v. City of Minneapolis 676 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
devoid of articulated reasons.” Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Sens.
CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 633 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 633 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lund v. Minnesota State Colleges & Universities 615 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lund v. Minnesota State Colleges & Universities 615 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(stating courts are not bound by agency’s interpretation of its governing statute but that if meaning of statute is doubtful, “courts should give great Weight to a construction placed upon [the statute] by the Department charged with its administration”) (quoting Krumm v. R.A.
McDermott v. Minnesota Teachers Retirement Fund 609 N.W.2d 926 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
McDermott v. Minnesota Teachers Retirement Fund 609 N.W.2d 926 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(citing Mammenga v. State Dep’t of *929 Human Servs., ), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In Re Twedt 598 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re Twedt 598 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
Jacka v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 580 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1998
Jacka v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 580 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1998
of Human Serv., Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 487-88 , 75 S.Ct.
Estate of Atkinson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 564 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1997
Estate of Atkinson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 564 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1997
While we are not bound by the agency’s interpretation, “ ‘[w]hen the meaning of a statute is doubtful, courts should give great weight to a construction placed upon it by the Department charged with its administration.’” (quoting Krumm v. R.A.
In Re the Proposal by Lakedale Telephone Co. to Offer Three Additional Class Services 561 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Proposal by Lakedale Telephone Co. to Offer Three Additional Class Services 561 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
An agency’s decision is arbitrary and capricious when the decision represents the agency’s will, rather than its judgment, or if the decision is “based on whim or is devoid of articulated reasons.” Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
Matter of Intra-Lata Equal Access 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Intra-Lata Equal Access 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-26 (Minn.1977); see Mammenga v. State, Dep't of Human Servs., (an agency's decision is presumed to be correct).
Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 532 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-26 (Minn.1977); see Mammenga v. State, Dep’t of Human Servs., (an agency’s decision is presumed to be correct).
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture 528 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture 528 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
An agency’s decision is arbitrary or capricious if “it represents the agency’s will, rather than its judgment.” ().
In Re Assessment Issued to Leisure Hills Health Care Center on March 2, 1992 518 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re Assessment Issued to Leisure Hills Health Care Center on March 2, 1992 518 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
An agency decision is arbitrary or capricious if it “is based on whim or is devoid of articulated reasons.”
In Re the Lawful Gambling License of Thief River Falls Amateur Hockey Ass'n, License No. 02008 515 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Lawful Gambling License of Thief River Falls Amateur Hockey Ass'n, License No. 02008 515 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
U.S. West Material Resources, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 511 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1994
U.S. West Material Resources, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 511 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1994
Krulish v. State Department of Human Services 510 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Krulish v. State Department of Human Services 510 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Magoon v. Commissioner of Public Safety 494 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1993