Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services, 442 N.W.2d 786.

69 citing documents.

Magoon v. Commissioner of Public Safety 494 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
A rule is unreasonable if "it is not rationally related to the objective sought to be achieved.”
Kaplan v. Washington County Community Social Services 494 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kaplan v. Washington County Community Social Services 494 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Evenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 489 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Evenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 489 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Young 476 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Young 476 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bal, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 469 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bal, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 469 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Crawford v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 468 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Crawford v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 468 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Mammenga v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., Brunner v. Minnesota Dep’t of Pub.
RS v. State 459 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1990
R.S. v. State 459 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1990
RS v. State 459 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1990
R.S. v. State 459 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1990
The state argues that “[w]hen the meaning of a statute is doubtful, courts should give great weight to a construction placed on it by the Department charged with its administration.”
In Re the Distributor's License of Minnesota Tipboard Co. 453 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Distributor's License of Minnesota Tipboard Co. 453 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hall v. City of Champlin 450 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hall v. City of Champlin 450 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In matters involving an agency’s interpretation of its governing statute, however, “[w]hen the meaning of a statute is doubtful, courts should give great weight to a construction placed upon it by the Department charged with its administration.” (quoting Krumm v. R.A.