Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Nielsen, 467 N.W.2d 615.

22 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
And I think the case [ ] that [the state] cited is on point and does apply here .
Ramsey County Thissen, J. Minn. 2020
Even if we assume without deciding that the district should have held a hearing, the improper admission of DNA evidence is harmless if it “did not have a significant impact on the verdict.” State v. Nielsen , (explaining that an evidentiary error is harmless unless it “substantially influences” the jury’s decision) (citation omitted) (internal 1 The Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure gener
State v. Weaver 733 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Weaver 733 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(holding that felony-murder rule applies whenever felony and homicide are parts of one continuous transaction, and rejecting defendant’s argument that he should have been acquitted of felony murder because rape was afterthought to homicide and the autopsy did not disclose whether rape took place befor
State v. Darris 648 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2002
State v. Darris 648 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2002
.1996) (affirming conviction when appellant shot and killed driver of car appellant was robbing); -45 (Minn.1995); (affirming conviction when appellant and others set out to rob gas station and shot and killed two people during the robbery); -14 (Minn.1993); -26 (Minn.1990) (affirming conviction when killing occurred after appellant committed a burglary).
State v. Morris 606 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2000
State v. Morris 606 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2000
State v. Bashire 606 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Bashire 606 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(on charge of murder while committing criminal sexual conduct with force or violence, defendant contended that victim was dead before he had sexual intercourse with her.
State v. Peou 579 N.W.2d 471 Minn. 1998
State v. Peou 579 N.W.2d 471 Minn. 1998
State v. Clark 887 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Bloom 516 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1994
State v. Bloom 516 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1994
we said that “the day may soon come” when there will be no need in a particular case for a hearing out of the jury’s presence to determine if the foundation for expert DNA testimony has been established.
State v. Bauer 512 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Bauer 512 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-20 (Minn.1991); , 45 n. 10 (Minn.App.1993), pet.
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Alt 504 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Alt 504 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
( on the separation of powers doctrine and the power to establish rules of evidence); , 429 n. 6 (citing Willis, d at 184 ).
Dunn v. State 486 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1992
Dunn v. State 486 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1992
(When felony and homicide “are parts of one continuous transaction” the felony murder rule applies.).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by