Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom, 495 N.W.2d 855.
- Wilmington Trust, National Association, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Wilmington Trust, National Association, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Douglas Kemp, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Juanda R. White, individually and as trustee for the next-of-kin of Deallo D. Felder, deceased, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 887 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 887 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group 877 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 2016
- Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group 877 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 2016
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
- Isaac v. Vy Thanh Ho 825 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2013
- Isaac v. Vy Thanh Ho 825 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2013
- Russell v. Haji-Ali 826 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Russell v. Haji-Ali
826 N.W.2d 216
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(holding that an injured claimant *221 may not compel arbitration of UIM coverage until after the tortfeasor’s liability and damages have been determined).
- Oganov v. American Family Insurance Group 767 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2009
- Oganov v. American Family Insurance Group 767 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2009
- Stroop v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 764 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- Stroop v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 764 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. 754 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co.
754 N.W.2d 578
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(requiring insured to recover from tortfeasor’s liability insurance before proceeding to arbitrate underinsured-benefits claim).
- George v. Evenson 754 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2008
-
George v. Evenson
754 N.W.2d 335
Minn. 2008
In Employers Mutual Cos. v. Nordstrom, we explained that “[ujnderin-sured coverage has generally been understood as excess coverage, to be utilized only after the cause of action against the insured tortfeasor has been concluded.”
- Antone v. Mirviss 720 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 2006
- Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Murray v. Puls 690 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Murray v. Puls 690 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Gerdesmeier v. Sutherland 690 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2004
-
Gerdesmeier v. Sutherland
690 N.W.2d 126
Minn. 2004
To the contrary, -59 (Minn.1993): The tort judgment establishes conclusively the damages to which the claimant is “legally entitled”; if such damages exceed the tort insurance limits, the excess is payable by the underinsurer to the extent of its coverage without the need for arbitration.
- Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
- Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
- Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd.
661 N.W.2d 680
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Nordstrom, -56 (Minn.1993) (same); Ruddy v. State Farm Mut.
- Noske v. Friedberg 656 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Noske v. Friedberg
656 N.W.2d 409
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(holding settlement or judgment against tortfeasor is condition precedent to bringing UIM claim); O’Neill v. Ill.
- Dohney v. Allstate Insurance Co. 632 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2001
-
Dohney v. Allstate Insurance Co.
632 N.W.2d 598
Minn. 2001
857 n. 3 (Minn.1993) (characterizing the court of appeals’ decision in Royal-Milbank Ins.
- Sheung Kwong v. Depositors Insurance Co. 627 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 2001
-
Sheung Kwong v. Depositors Insurance Co.
627 N.W.2d 52
Minn. 2001
(holding that recovery from the tortfeasor’s insurer is a condition precedent to a claim for UIM benefits).
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co. 617 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2000
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co. 617 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2000
- Sheung Kwong v. Depositors Insurance Co. 612 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Sheung Kwong v. Depositors Insurance Co. 612 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 594 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
594 N.W.2d 243
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
clarified that the insured must first recover from the tortfeasor’s insurance company by either pursuing the tort claim to conclusion in a district court action or by reaching a settlement * * * before pursuing the UIM claim.
- Moundson v. Bitzan 588 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Moundson v. Bitzan 588 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Cattnach v. State Farm Insurance Co. 577 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Cattnach v. State Farm Insurance Co.
577 N.W.2d 251
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
to support an argument that they were required to complete their tort action against Ringold before their UIM cause of action accrued.
- Butzer v. Allstate Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1997