Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom, 495 N.W.2d 855.

72 citing documents.

Butzer v. Allstate Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-59 (Minn.1993) (stating that if the tort judgment damages exceed the tort insurance limits, “the excess is payable by the underinsurer” to the extent of its coverage without the need for redetermining damages); Costello v. Aetna Cas.
Washington v. Milbank Insurance Co. 562 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1997
Washington v. Milbank Insurance Co. 562 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1997
and paragraph 3 of the loan agreement, required the Wash-ingtons “to pursue the tortfeasor to conclusion before [they are] entitled to arbitrate the UIM claim.” Based on Mübank’s refusal to arbitrate, the Washingtons commenced a new lawsuit against Presley alleging the same causes of action they brought i
Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1997
Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1997
-58 (Minn.1993) (explaining that the plaintiff recovers the “gap” if the underinsurer allows a settlement and a release for the tortfeasor); Broton, d at 89-90 .
Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 552 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1996
Washington v. Milbank Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Washington v. Milbank Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
*515 required respondents to continue seeking liability benefits from the tortfeasor and State Farm before they were entitled to arbitration of their UIM claim.
Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 541 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 541 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
the supreme court held that an insured must recover on a tort claim before bringing an arbitration claim for UIM benefits: “Until there has been a recovery from the tortfea-sor’s insurer, the claimant’s [UIM] claim simply has not matured.” Id.
Greenwaldt v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 526 N.W.2d 202 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Greenwaldt v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 526 N.W.2d 202 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(“An underin-sured motorist claim is both alike and unlike a tort cause of action.” (emphasis added)).
Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 524 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 524 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
He moved for summary judgment
Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1994
Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1994
Beaudry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1994
Beaudry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1994
Recently, we discussed the nature of uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage.
Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. 505 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. 505 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Beaudry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 506 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Beaudry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 506 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993