Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jobe, 486 N.W.2d 407.

62 citing documents.

State v. Bloom 516 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1994
State v. Bloom 516 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1994
Then, we held (a) that the FBI’s internal audit of its DNA RFLP testing procedures sufficiently complied with accepted standards and guidelines, and (b) that the pretrial admissibility hearing should focus only on the testing laboratory’s compliance with appropriate standards and controls, not on the basic reli
State v. Bauer 512 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Bauer 512 N.W.2d 112 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Barna v. Commissioner of Public Safety 508 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Barna v. Commissioner of Public Safety 508 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993) (trial court must determine “reliability” of theory or test); (admissibility of a scientific test requires a showing that the scientific technique has gained general acceptance among experts in the field).
State v. Alt 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1993
State v. Alt 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1993
State v. Alt 504 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Alt 504 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Before the hearing on the state’s motion, -20 (Minn.1992), in which it held that the FBI laboratory’s protocol established an appropriate set of standards and guidelines, despite the lack of an independent laboratory audit of FBI testing.
State v. Johnson 498 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1993
State v. Johnson 498 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1993
This court’s lends further support to the trial court ruling.