Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ecker, 524 N.W.2d 712.

521 citing documents.

Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
See, (“The trial judge must be particularly attentive to situations in which a defendant is pleading guilty and is asked only leading questions by counsel.”); see also Raleigh, d at 95 (noting “[w]e have long discouraged [the] practice” of relying exclusively on leading questions to establish a pr
Campos v. State 816 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 2012
Campos v. State 816 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 2012
366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985) (holding that a defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel, rendering his guilty plea not intelligent); (“When an accused is represented by counsel, the voluntariness of the plea depends on whether counsel’s advice was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.” (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
Barnslater v. State 805 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Barnslater v. State 805 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Sames v. State 805 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Sames v. State 805 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
366, 369 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985)
State v. Petersen 799 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Petersen 799 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Kelsey v. State, 298 Minn. 531, 532
Campos v. State 798 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Campos v. State 798 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
When an accused is represented by counsel, the validity of a plea “depends on whether counsel’s advice was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.” (quotations omitted).
State v. Jeffries 787 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Jeffries 787 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Raleigh 778 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2010
State v. Raleigh 778 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2010
Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
For a guilty plea to be valid, it “must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
The accuracy requirement is intended to protect “the defendant from pleading guilty to a charge more serious than he or she could be convicted of were the defendant to go to trial.”
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(concluding that the defendant’s testimony at the plea hearing established an adequate factual basis); (endorsing the use of witness statements or testimony to develop a factual basis).
State v. Theis 742 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2007
State v. Theis 742 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2007
We have recognized three requirements for a valid plea: “it must be accurate, voluntary and intelligent.”
Munger v. State 737 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Munger v. State 737 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
For a guilty plea to be accurate, “[a] proper factual basis must be established.”
Black v. State 725 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Black v. State 725 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
But a criminal defendant may withdraw a guilty plea, even after sentencing, if the defendant shows that “withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” -16 (Minn.1994) (quoting Minn. R.Crim.
Erickson v. State 702 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Erickson v. State 702 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(holding that the contested plea was voluntary because defendant repeatedly stated on the record that he was making his own decision).
James v. State 699 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 2005
State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
But a criminal defendant may withdraw a guilty plea, even after sentencing, if the defendant shows that “withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” -716 (Minn.1994) (quoting Minn. R.Crim.
Henderson v. State 675 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 2004
Henderson v. State 675 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 2004
Johnson v. State 673 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2004
Johnson v. State 673 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2004
Taylor v. State 670 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2003
Taylor v. State 670 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2003
State v. Iverson 664 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2003
State v. Iverson 664 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2003
Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
Finally, appellant asserts he received ineffective representation in negotiating a plea agreement with “off-the-record terms.” We have said that the “volun-tariness of the plea depends on whether counsel’s advice was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.” (internal quotations omitted).
State v. Abdisalan 661 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Abdisalan 661 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(guilty plea may not be produced through actual or threatened physical harm or by mental coercion “overbearing the will of the defendant”) (quoting Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 750-51 , 90 S.Ct.
In Re the Welfare of J.J.R. 648 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of J.J.R. 648 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Bolinger v. State 647 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Bolinger v. State 647 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
“On appeal, the scope of our review is limited to the question of whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of the postconviction court.”
State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Kaiser v. State 621 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2001