DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ecker, 524 N.W.2d 712.

521 citing documents.

  • Kaiser v. State 621 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • In Re the Welfare of S.J.D. 617 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • In Re the Welfare of S.J.D. 617 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    See, (holding that threat to prosecute fully a defendant if he does not plead guilty is constitutional); (finding nothing improper about statement by state that it will fully prosecute if there is no plea agreement because state is merely pointing out it
  • Smith v. State 596 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Smith v. State 596 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    (holding sufficient factual basis for guilty plea must be established to ensure its accuracy).
  • Sykes v. State 578 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Sykes v. State 578 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    There must be something in addition, such as a showing that the state actually induced the defendant to plead guilty “through actual or threatened physical harm, or by mental coercion ‘overbearing the will of the defendant.’ ” (holding state may not procure guilty plea by actual or threatened use of physical harm or mental coercion overcoming the will of defendant) (quoting Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 750 , 90 S.Ct.
  • Powell v. State 562 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • Powell v. State 562 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 , 91 S.Ct.
  • State v. Aviles-Alvarez 561 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Aviles-Alvarez 561 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • Hennepin County v. Perry 561 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1997
  • Hennepin County v. Perry 561 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1997
    2052, 2064-65 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
  • Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
    3; Langer v. State, 287 Minn. 320, 322
  • State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
    2); 914 (Minn.1992) (overruling, as an abuse of discretion, the exclusion of excited utterances to a 911 operator by a mother and daughter that the daughter had been sexually abused); that the evidence was sufficient without the forensic testing now demanded by appellant; that, on the limited record before us, counsel was not ineffective, (stating that a defendant has an affirmative obligation to show that an addi *474 tional witness would have been found by counsel if an effort was made, and th
  • McMaster v. State 551 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1996
  • McMaster v. State 551 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1996
    Posteonviction rulings are reviewed “under an abuse of discretion standard.”
  • Perkins v. State 540 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Perkins v. State 540 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1995