Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ecker, 524 N.W.2d 712.

521 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Michael Devon Jarmon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Devon Jarmon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Megan Marie Kochendorfer v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Scott Andrew Marcucci v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Scott Andrew Marcucci v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Megan Marie Kochendorfer v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joe Maria Vento Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joe Maria Vento Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sara Elaine Katra v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sara Elaine Katra v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A valid guilty plea “must be accurate, voluntary and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Darrell Mandall Nickerson, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Darrell Mandall Nickerson, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robert William Silker v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robert William Silker v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In order for a plea to be valid, “it must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Edward Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Edward Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.”
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ofiong Louis Sanders v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ofiong Louis Sanders v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Trent Johnson 867 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Trent Johnson 867 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A guilty plea is valid if it is “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.” ().
Dustin Alan Edsill v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dustin Alan Edsill v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
For a guilty plea to be valid, it “must be accurate, voluntary and 3 intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that defendant’s 6 motivation to avoid more charges or serious penalties is insufficient to support withdrawal of guilty plea).
Luis Esteban Pliego Cortes v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Luis Esteban Pliego Cortes v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A proper factual basis must be established for a guilty plea to be accurate.”
State of Minnesota v. Eric Peter Elijio Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric Peter Elijio Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31, 91 S. Ct. 160, 164 (1970) (stating that the standard for a valid plea is whether the plea represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant); (recognizing that a valid guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent); (holding that a district court may accept a guilty plea, though the defendant claims innocence, if it reasonably concludes that the evidence supports a guilty v
Abshir Abtidon Barrow v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2015
Abshir Abtidon Barrow v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2015
We have held that there are “three prerequisites to a valid guilty plea: it must be accurate, voluntary and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and 10 understandingly made).”
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 2015
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 2015
We have held that there are “three prerequisites to a valid guilty plea: it must be accurate, voluntary and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and understanding^ made).”
State of Minnesota v. Leroy Hamer, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Leroy Hamer, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robyn Lynn Hager v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robyn Lynn Hager v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
And we have cautioned against the use of exclusively leading questions to establish a proper factual basis for a guilty plea.” (alteration, quotations, and citation omitted)); (“[W]e again discourage the use of leading questions to establish a factual basis.”).
State of Minnesota v. Abdul Khalid Hakeem Malik El Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Abdul Khalid Hakeem Malik El Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To be a valid, a guilty plea “must be accurate, voluntary and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and understandingly made).” d 712, 716 (Minn. 1994) ().
Lynell Richard Ellison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lynell Richard Ellison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Robert Patrick Butters Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gerald Raymond Gustafson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gerald Raymond Gustafson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A proper factual basis must be established for a guilty plea to be accurate.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert Patrick Butters Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But a defendant “may withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing ‘upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the court that withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.’” -16 (Minn. 1994).