Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Perry v. State, 595 N.W.2d 197.

23 citing documents.

Anthony Scott David Auginaush, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
3 (2022) ( also stating that a district court “may summarily deny a petition when the issues raised in it have previously been decided by the court of appeals or the supreme court in the same case”); (citing Minn. Stat. § 590.04, subd.
Lance Arnold Kingbird, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kenny Lee Reed, FKA: Gordon David Reese, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Thomas Lee Fairbanks v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2016
Thomas Lee Fairbanks v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2016
Jason Lee Bolstad v. State of Minnesota 878 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 2016
Jason Lee Bolstad v. State of Minnesota 878 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 2016
Spears v. State 725 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2006
Spears v. State 725 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2006
Minn. Stat. § 590.04 , subd.
Johnson v. State 697 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2005
Johnson v. State 697 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2005
Quick v. State 692 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 2005
Quick v. State 692 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 2005
Koskela v. State 690 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 2004
Koskela v. State 690 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 2004
King v. State 649 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2002
King v. State 649 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2002
Pierson v. State 637 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 2002
Pierson v. State 637 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 2002
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
“The scope of review of a postconviction proceeding is limited to determining whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the postconviction court’s findings, and a postconviction court’s decision will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.” (placing the burden on appellant to prove an abuse of discretion).
Dukes v. State 621 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2001
Dukes v. State 621 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2001