Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Haataja, 611 N.W.2d 353.

22 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Deshaun Arnez-Lamar Baker Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Deshaun Arnez-Lamar Baker Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The factual basis required to support a stop is minimal, and an actual violation is not necessary.” (quotations omitted), rev. denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Appellant’s argument is unavailing because “an actual violation is not necessary.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The reasonable- suspicion standard is not high, and “an actual violation is not necessary.” State v. Haataja , review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Th e reasonable-suspicion standard is not high, Diede, d at 843, and “an actual violation is not necessary.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
State of Minnesota v. Mary Lynn Boline Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Distinguished State of Minnesota v. Mary Lynn Boline Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. May 16, 2000).
State of Minnesota v. Terrance Paul DeRoche Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Terrance Paul DeRoche Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The reasonable-suspicion standard is not high, Diede, d at 843, and “an actual violation is not necessary.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
Brett Richard Kline v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Brett Richard Kline v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000) (“The factual basis required to support a stop is minimal .
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The factual basis required to support a stop is minimal.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
State of Minnesota v. Paul Joseph Hager Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paul Joseph Hager Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The factual basis required to support a stop is minimal.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
State of Minnesota v. Michael James Berry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael James Berry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 “The factual basis required to support a stop is minimal, and an actual violation is not necessary.” review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
Duncan v. Commissioner of Public Safety 683 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Duncan v. Commissioner of Public Safety 683 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
“The factual basis required to support a stop is minimal, and an actual violation [of the law] is not necessary.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).
State v. Tomaino 627 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Tomaino 627 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
We will find that the continued investigatory stop of a vehicle is lawful where the officer had “a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 25, 2000).