Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lalli, 338 N.W.2d 419.

30 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Nyapuot Dech Kuek Minn. Ct. App. 2026
see State v. Hill , d 824, 830 (Minn. 2025) (“Corpus delicti is Latin for the body of the crime.”) (quotations omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Ibn Marchone Abdullah Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Ibn Marchone Abdullah Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1 Charles T. McCormick, McCormick on Evidence § 146, at 194 (Robert P. Mosteller ed., 8th ed. Supp. 2022) (citations omitted); see also Holl, d at 807 n.6, 810 (citing 1 McCormick on Evidence § 145 (Robert P. Mosteller ed., 8th ed. 2020)); (citing McCormick on Evidence § 158 (2d ed. 1972)); State v. Hill, ____ N.W.3d ____, ____, 2024 WL 3490357, at *4 (Minn. App. July 16, 2024), petition for rev. filed (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2022
(explaining that we did not need to decide whether section 634.03 applied to a question regarding the sufficiency of evidence to indict under Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Morgan Holl Minn. 2021
For example, we clearly stated that “[t]he requirement that the corpus delicti be established by evidence independent of the confession is codified at Minn. Stat. § 634.03 (1982).” But a few months later, our M.D.S.
State of Minnesota (A18-1999) (A18-1957,) v. Torrance Lee Royster (A18-1957) (A18-1999) Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Lalli , 16 (affirming durational and dispositional departures, both relying on the offense-related factor of a “major economic offense”).
In re the Welfare of C.M.A. 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re CMA 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re CMA 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re the Welfare of C.M.A. 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. O'HAGAN 474 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. O'HAGAN 474 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Glidden 455 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1990
State v. Glidden 455 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1990
(aggregation used to give a first-time offender a large criminal history score and prison sentence) (aggregating multiple takings into a single charge rather than into multiple charges).
State v. Schenk 427 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Schenk 427 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Litzinger 394 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1986
State v. Litzinger 394 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1986
See, where the consolidation was done at the prosecutor’s recommendation.
State v. Vaughn 361 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1985
State v. Vaughn 361 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1985
State v. Zeigler 356 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Anderson 356 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Anderson 356 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Zeigler 356 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Similarly, the court upheld both a dispositional and an upward durational departure based on the same aggravating factor — that the defendant committed a major economic offense.
State v. Wittig 343 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Wittig 343 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Moore 340 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1983
State v. Moore 340 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1983