Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Disciplinary Action Against Quinn, 605 N.W.2d 396.

30 citing documents.

Linda Holper v. City of Gilman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A24-1910 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
municipalities are immune from liability for claims based upon the performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty[.]” (quotation omitted); see also Minn. Stat. § 466.03, subd.
In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Death Benefit for Eric William Groebner (Deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-03 (Minn. 2000); Magnolia 8 Props., , 665 (Minn. App. 2017).
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jay A. Rosenberg, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0397875. ... Minn. 2025
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jay A. Rosenberg, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0397875. ... Minn. 2025
d, instead of the “identical” discipline of a 3-year suspension, in a reciprocal discipline case for practicing for 20 months after the attorney’s provisional license expired in South Dakota); (issuing a public reprimand after attorney practiced for 20 years without submitting CLE affidavits, constituting unauthorized practice of law); (issuing a public reprimand after attorney engaged in 17 years of unauthorized practice because of CLE and attorney fee compliance issues).
Minor Doe 601, a minor, by and through his mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 601, Appellants, vs. … Minn. 2025
This means that the municipality must produce evidence of “how it made the decision for which it claims immunity.”
Christine L. Rathbun v. Fillmore County Minn. Ct. App. 2024
284 (Minn. App. 2014) (applying de novo review to an assertion of vicarious official immunity); (applying de novo review to an assertion of statutory immunity).
Shane Feldhaus v. City of Minnetonka Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minor Doe 601, a minor, by and through his mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 601, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Nicholas W. Sterry, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
6 (2008)); (interpreting Minn. Stat. § 466.02, subd.
Brenda Lutzke, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Brandon Grim, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Robert C. Tengdin, Trustee of the Robert C. Tengdin Revocable Trust dated May 18, 2009, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In determining the applicability of statutory discretionary function 7 immunity, we focus on “whether the conduct at issue involves the balancing of public policy considerations in the formulation of policy.” Conlin v. City of Saint Paul
Cody Lee Elven, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minn. Stat. § 466.02 (2020)
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Minn. 2020
Nell Mathews, et al. Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Magnolia 8 Properties, LLC v. City of Maple Plain 893 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Barbara Kuntz v. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Minn. Ct. App. 2015
J.E.B. v. Danks 785 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2010
JW Ex Rel. BRW v. 287 INTER. DIST. 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
J.W. ex rel. B.R.W. v. 287 Intermediate District 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re Peer Review Action 749 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rudawski 710 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2006
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rudawski 710 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2006
In seeking a disciplinary sanction less severe than that recommended by the referee, Rudawski argues that his case is most closely analogous to
Hyatt v. Anoka Police Department 700 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Minder v. Anoka County 677 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Olmanson v. Le Sueur County 673 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Paul, the court found that respondent only provided minimal averments in its affidavits supporting immunity and did not explain the “how” and “why” of adopting the policy.
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
See, (motorcyclist injured in tip-over alleges city was negligent in failing to inspect and maintain street, creating the hazardous condition, and failing to warn of the dangerous condition); (landowners challenge city-imposed lateral benefit water
Fear v. Independent School District 911 634 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In reaching its conclusion
Christopherson v. City of Albert Lea 623 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 2001