Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 336 N.W.2d 288.

108 citing documents.

Fernow v. Gould 835 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 2013
Fernow v. Gould 835 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 2013
Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 813 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 2012
Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 813 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 2012
Ins., ); see also Latterell, d at 925 n. 4.
Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 806 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 806 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Western National Insurance Co. v. Thompson 797 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 2011
Western National Insurance Co. v. Thompson 797 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 2011
Co., -91 (Minn.1983) (concluding that the policy definition of an underinsured motor vehicle *207 was valid and did not extend to vehicle in question); see also U.S. Fid.
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Star Windshield Repair, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Star Windshield Repair, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Mitsch v. American National Property & Casualty Co. 736 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Mitsch v. American National Property & Casualty Co. 736 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Co., (holding that owned-vehicle exclusion in insurance policy barring UIM coverage did not violate no-fault act when the exclusion served to prevent coverage conversion).
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Turner v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 675 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2004
Turner v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 675 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2004
Kelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 666 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 2003
Kelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 666 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 2003
Co., Petrich, d at 245-46 .
Johnson v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. 627 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Johnson v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. 627 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 626 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 626 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
Schons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 621 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 2001
Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 612 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 612 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 611 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 611 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., -91 (Minn.1983) (explaining Fruchtman).
EMC Insurance Companies v. Dvorak 603 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
EMC Insurance Companies v. Dvorak 603 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., -92 (Minn.1983) (holding an insurance policy valid that excludes UIM coverage for a vehicle owned by or furnished or made available for the regular use of the named insured); see also Thommen v. Illinois Farmers Ins.
Northrup v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 601 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Northrup v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 601 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Taylor v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America 992 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Jirik Ex Rel. Jirik v. AUTO-OWNERS INS. 595 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Jirik Ex Rel. Jirik v. AUTO-OWNERS INS. 595 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (injured person may not collect both liability and underinsured motorists benefits on same at-fault vehicle).
West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. 586 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. 586 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Staley v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 576 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Staley v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 576 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., did not preclude a UIM claim by Lahr against American.
Wintz v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California 542 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1996
Wintz v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California 542 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1996
Co., determined that if “the policy provisions are unambiguous and the essential facts are known, [this court] can proceed, as a matter of law, to decide the coverage question.” Id.
AMCO Insurance v. Ashwood-Ames 534 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
AMCO Insurance v. Ashwood-Ames 534 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 528 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 528 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wintz v. Colonial Insurance Co. of California 526 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wintz v. Colonial Insurance Co. of California 526 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co., (where the fatally injured person was a passenger in an automobile which struck a tree, that automobile was not an “underin-sured motor vehicle” under the owner’s policy for the purpose of a UIM benefit claim by the passenger’s heirs).
Jensen v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 524 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Jensen v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 524 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ins., (denying coverage because it would convert “first-party” UIM coverage into “third-party insurance”).