Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 336 N.W.2d 288.

108 citing documents.

Davis v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 521 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Davis v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 521 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Co., regarding the function of UM and UIM coverage.
Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom 495 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1993
Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom 495 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1993
Co., and United States Fidelity & (uninsured claim); and a recovery from the tort-feasor’s liability insurance is a nonarbitra-ble condition precedent to bringing an un-derinsured claim.
Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 486 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 486 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., has upheld the exclusion in strictly limited cases when the injured party seeks first-party benefits after suffering injury while occupying or by being struck by an uninsured vehicle.
Smith v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 455 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Smith v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 455 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See, (UIM exclusion for vehicles owned by named insured); (exclusion of UIM coverage for vehicle owned by named insured); (family-owned vehicle exclusion), pet.
Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 451 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 451 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
for rev. denied (Minn. May 1, 1985)
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Luhman 438 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Luhman 438 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
A second line of cases, however, has upheld the “family owned vehicle” exclusion under factual circumstances similar to this case.
Thommen v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 437 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1989
Thommen v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 437 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1989
Co., this court held that the exclusion of a car owned by the named insured from the definition of “underin-sured motor vehicle” does not violate the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act.
Safeco Insurance Co. v. Goldenberg 435 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Safeco Insurance Co. v. Goldenberg 435 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Austin Mutual Insurance Co. v. Templin 428 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1988
Austin Mutual Insurance Co. v. Templin 428 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1988
Ins., where the claimant was killed in a one-car accident and his heirs collected the car owner’s liability limits then also sought underinsured coverage under the owner’s policy.
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 426 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 426 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1988
However, -91 (Minn.1983), that coverage issues under an insurance policy are not the same as coverage issues under a labor collective bargaining agreement.
Synstelien v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 418 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Synstelien v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 418 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
the supreme court upheld an identical policy exclusion.
Duran v. Hartford Insurance 755 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 414 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
1 the deceased passenger was involved in a one-car accident.
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
By contrast, the court held that a coverage dispute involving the application of an unambiguous policy provision to known facts was properly not submitted to arbitration.
Nurmi v. Foremost Insurance Co. 376 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nurmi v. Foremost Insurance Co. 376 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
court stated that, despite the repeal of the mandatory offer provision, the Holman rule is still applicable, explaining: The purpose of underinsured motorist protection is “to protect the named insured and other additional insureds from suffering an inadequately compensated injury caused by an accident with an inadequately insured automobile.”
Great American Insurance Co. v. Sticha 374 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Great American Insurance Co. v. Sticha 374 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Meyer v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Group 371 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1985
Meyer v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Group 371 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1985
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Tank 703 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kraayenbrink 370 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kraayenbrink 370 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Rector v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 369 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Rector v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 369 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
DeVille v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 367 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
DeVille v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 367 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Linder Ex Rel. Linder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Linder Ex Rel. Linder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Berg v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 359 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Berg v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 359 N.W.2d 726 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., (underinsured motorist coverage is first-party coverage and follows the person, not the vehicle); (liability insurance is third-party coverage which follows the vehicle, not the person).
Eisenschenk v. Millers' Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois 353 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Meyer v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Group 353 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1984