Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite White v. Metropolitan Medical Center, 332 N.W.2d 25.

296 citing documents.

Tiffany Thompson, Relator v. Jefferson Partners LP, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Tiffany Thompson, Relator v. Jefferson Partners LP, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ctr., (“An employee who was dismissed, pursuant to terms of a collective bargaining agreement, for nonpayment of union dues is not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits.”).
Enterprise Communications, Inc. v. Department of Employment Economic Development 724 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Enterprise Communications, Inc. v. Department of Employment Economic Development 724 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Jenkins v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL CORP. 702 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Jenkins v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL CORP. 702 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Thompson v. County of Hennepin 660 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Thompson v. County of Hennepin 660 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Peppi v. Phyllis Wheatley Community Center 614 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Peppi v. Phyllis Wheatley Community Center 614 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Edward v. Sentinel Manangement Co. 611 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Edward v. Sentinel Manangement Co. 611 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hein v. PRECISION ASSOCIATES, INC. 609 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hein v. PRECISION ASSOCIATES, INC. 609 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Board Order, Kells v. City of Rochester 597 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Board Order, Kells v. City of Rochester 597 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sinykin v. Commissioner of Economic Security 594 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sinykin v. Commissioner of Economic Security 594 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Kalberg v. Park & Recreation Board of Minneapolis 563 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Kalberg v. Park & Recreation Board of Minneapolis 563 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Haskins v. Choice Auto Rental, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Haskins v. Choice Auto Rental, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Neve v. Austin Daily Herald 552 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Neve v. Austin Daily Herald 552 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(applying test in case involving qualification for reemployment insurance benefits).
Hart-Wilke v. Aetna Life Insurance 550 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hart-Wilke v. Aetna Life Insurance 550 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
White v. Metropol *313 itan Medical Ctr.
Imprint Tech. v. ECONOMIC SEC. COM'R 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Imprint Technologies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Imprint Technologies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Economic Security 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
The findings of the Commissioner’s representative, however, must “be viewed in the light most favorable to the decision, and if there is evidence reasonably tending to sustain them, they will not be disturbed.”
Imprint Tech. v. ECONOMIC SEC. COM'R 535 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Loewen v. Lakeland Mental Health Center, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Loewen v. Lakeland Mental Health Center, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc. 529 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Whitehead v. Moonlight Nursing Care, Inc. 529 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Tuff v. Knitcraft Corp. 526 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1995
Tuff v. Knitcraft Corp. 526 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1995
In Chellson v. Division of Employment and Sec., 214 Minn. 332 , we held that the applicable standard of review is “whether there is reasonable support in the evidence to sustain the decision of the director [now commissioner] rather than the decision of the appeal tribunal [now referee].” 214 Minn. at 335 , d at 44
Peksa v. Fairview-Southdale Hosp. 512 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Peksa v. Fairview-Southdale Hosp. 512 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hanke v. Safari Hair Adventure 512 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hanke v. Safari Hair Adventure 512 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Mitchell v. Crookston Welding MacHine Co. 492 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mitchell v. Crookston Welding MacHine Co. 492 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Wood v. Menard, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Wood v. Menard, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Markel v. City of Circle Pines 479 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1992
Markel v. City of Circle Pines 479 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1992
Findings of fact must be “viewed in the light most favorable to the decision, and if there is evidence reasonably tending to sus *384 tain them, they will not be disturbed.”
Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co. 478 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co. 478 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See White v. Metropolitan *779 Medical Center
Markel v. City of Circle Pines 465 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Markel v. City of Circle Pines 465 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Grotjohn v. Cornbelt Foods, Inc., ().