Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Rutten v. Rutten, 347 N.W.2d 47.

510 citing documents.

Marriage of Guyer v. Guyer 587 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(trial court has broad discretion in determining child support and its determination will be upheld unless there is a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on the record).
Crosby v. Crosby 587 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Crosby v. Crosby 587 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Rohricht v. O'HARE 586 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Rohricht v. O'HARE 586 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Harold Farsdale, State of Minnesota v. Oscar Rios Martinez 586 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Farsdale v. Martinez 586 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Harold Farsdale, State of Minnesota v. Oscar Rios Martinez 586 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(a trial court abuses its discretion when its conclusion is against logic and facts on record).
Farsdale v. Martinez 586 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(a trial court abuses its discretion when its conclusion is against logic and facts on record).
Marriage of Murphy v. Murphy 574 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Murphy v. Murphy 574 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
A trial court has “broad discretion” in setting child support, and we will not reverse an exercise of that discretion absent a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on *80 record.”
Marriage of Dobrin v. Dobrin 569 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1997
Criticized Marriage of Dobrin v. Dobrin 569 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1997
County of Washington v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
County of Washington v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
The district court has broad discretion to determine child support, and its decision will not be reversed unless the district court reached “a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.”
Santillan v. Martine 560 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Santillan v. Martine 560 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Marriage of Carrick v. Carrick 560 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Marriage of Carrick v. Carrick 560 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Marriage of Gales v. Gales 553 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1996
Kitchar v. Kitchar 553 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Kitchar v. Kitchar 553 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Korf v. Korf 553 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Korf v. Korf 553 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 552 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Kuchinski v. Kuchinski 551 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Kuchinski v. Kuchinski 551 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
This court may reverse the district court’s order only where it finds a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.”
Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 552 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Desrosier v. Desrosier 551 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Desrosier v. Desrosier 551 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Kahn v. Tronnier 547 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of LaFreniere-Nietz v. Nietz 547 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Kahn v. Tronnier 547 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
The district court has broad discretion in setting support and its decision will not be altered on appeal absent a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the fact on record * *
Marriage of LaFreniere-Nietz v. Nietz 547 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Marden v. Marden 546 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Marden v. Marden 546 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Mower County Human Services ex rel. Swancutt v. Swancutt 539 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Mower County Human Services ex rel. Swancutt v. Swancutt 539 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
The decision will not be reversed unless it is a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on the record.”
Roatch v. Puera 534 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Roatch v. Puera 534 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Hock-Lien v. Hicks 533 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Hock-Lien v. Hicks 533 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Allan v. Allan 509 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Allan v. Allan 509 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The decision to modify a child support order lies in the district court’s broad discretion and will be reversed only for a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.” ().
Marriage of Nazar v. Nazar 505 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Nazar v. Nazar 505 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Poehls v. Poehls 502 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Poehls v. Poehls 502 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Kuronen v. Kuronen 499 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Kuronen v. Kuronen 499 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1993