Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Rutten v. Rutten, 347 N.W.2d 47.

510 citing documents.

Erickson v. Erickson 409 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
An abuse of discretion exists only if the appellate court finds a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.”
Marriage of Marx v. Marx 409 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Meyers v. Meyers 409 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marraige of Hellerstedt v. Hellerstedt 409 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Marx v. Marx 409 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
ANALYSIS I Modification of child support orders “lies in the broad and sound discretion of the trial court, and an appellate court will reverse for an abuse of that discretion only where it finds a ‘clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.’ ” ().
Marraige of Hellerstedt v. Hellerstedt 409 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Meyers v. Meyers 409 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of General v. General 409 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of General v. General 409 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Katz v. Katz 408 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1987
Marriage of Katz v. Katz 408 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1987
As we indicated in Moylan , where the broad and sound discretion of the trial court is exercised within the limits set out by the legislature, an appellate court will not reverse unless it finds a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.” Moylan, d at 864 ().
In Re the Marriage of Larson 408 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Marriage of Larson 408 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Trial courts have broad discretion to modify child support payments, and “an appellate court will reverse for an abuse of that discretion only where it finds a ‘clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.’ ” ().
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roel v. Roel 406 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Although a trial court has broad discretion with respect to the division of property, and its decision will be overturned only upon an abuse of discretion, the characterization of a type of property as marital or nonmar-ital is a question of law upon which an appellate court may exercise independent judgment.
Marriage of Roth v. Roth 406 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Novak v. Novak 406 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roth v. Roth 406 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Novak v. Novak 406 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
It is well established that the decision to modify a child support order lies in the broad and sound discretion of the trial court, and an appellate court will reverse for an abuse of discretion only where it finds a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.” ().
Marriage of Lockhart v. Lockhart 405 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lockhart v. Lockhart 405 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
ANALYSIS Modification of child support orders “lies in the broad and sound discretion of the trial court, and an appellate court will reverse for an abuse of that discretion only where it finds a ‘clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.’ ” ().
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tollefson v. Tollefson 403 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tollefson v. Tollefson 403 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Stevens County Social Service Department Ex. Rel. Banken v. Banken 403 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Stevens County Social Service Department Ex. Rel. Banken v. Banken 403 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Jackson v. Jackson 403 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Jackson v. Jackson 403 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
It is well established that the decision to modify a child support order lies in the broad and sound discretion of the trial court, and an appellate court will reverse for an abuse of that discretion only where it finds a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.” ().
Kuebelbeck v. Humphrey 402 N.W.2d 202 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kuebelbeck v. Humphrey 402 N.W.2d 202 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(the trial court is in the best position to determine an appropriate visitation schedule).
Marriage of Strauch v. Strauch 401 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Strauch v. Strauch 401 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Olson v. Olson 399 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Olson v. Olson 399 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The decision to modify a child support order lies in the broad and sound discretion of the trial court, and an appellate court will reverse for an abuse of that discretion only where it finds a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.”
Marriage of Finck v. Finck 399 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Finck v. Finck 399 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The appellate court will only reverse for abuse of discretion where it finds a “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.”
Wilkus-Schmidt-Hight v. Wilkus 398 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilkus-Schmidt-Hight v. Wilkus 398 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Stromberg v. Stromberg 397 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Stromberg v. Stromberg 397 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Sundell v. Sundell 396 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Sundell v. Sundell 396 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Davis v. Davis 394 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Larson v. Hendrickson 394 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Barrett v. Barrett 394 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Barrett v. Barrett 394 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Larson v. Hendrickson 394 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1986