Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Boom v. Boom, 361 N.W.2d 34.
- Patrick Hugh Stack, et al., petitioners, Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota v. Paula Jean Yackel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Paula Jean Yackel
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Jan.
- In Re the Welfare of J.L.P. 701 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
In Re the Welfare of J.L.P.
701 N.W.2d 282
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(outlining factors to consider in determining whether to dismiss for nonjurisdictional defect, including prejudice to the other party); (applying Boom factors in criminal appeal).
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Scott 530 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Scott 530 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- In Re the Welfare of D.B. 463 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- In Re the Welfare of D.B. 463 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Marriage of Hofseth v. Hofseth 456 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Marriage of Hofseth v. Hofseth
456 N.W.2d 99
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(dismissal for procedural errors inappropriate absent substantial prejudice to respondent).
- In Re the Recommendation for Discharge of Brown 434 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
In Re the Recommendation for Discharge of Brown
434 N.W.2d 277
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(dismissal not always required for nonjurisdictional defects).
- STATE OF MINN., CITY OF LITTLE CANADA v. Rachie 427 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
STATE OF MINN., CITY OF LITTLE CANADA v. Rachie
427 N.W.2d 253
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
the supreme court held that a dismissal for noncompliance with the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure is inappropriate when the failure to follow the rules neither affects the court’s jurisdiction nor causes delay or prejudice.
- Marriage of Knutson v. Zenk 413 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Knutson v. Zenk 413 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Theisen v. Theisen 405 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Theisen v. Theisen 405 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Scientific Computers, Inc. 384 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Scientific Computers, Inc. 384 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Grose 387 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Grose 387 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Bjornson 378 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Bjornson
378 N.W.2d 4
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Before this appeal will be dismissed for noncompliance with a technical, nonju-risdictional matter, must be applied to the facts.
- Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kraayenbrink 370 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kraayenbrink 370 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kraayenbrink 365 N.W.2d 229 Minn. 1985
-
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kraayenbrink
365 N.W.2d 229
Minn. 1985
1 in which we set forth the factors to be considered in the disposition of a motion to dismiss for technical noncompliance with the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, we reverse and remand for reconsideration under Boom .