DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Morgan v. State, 384 N.W.2d 458.

24 citing documents.

  • Paul Scott Seeman, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    [the recanted] testimony implicating [appellant]”); see also Morgan v. State , (deciding that the appellant was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction claim because there was other convincing evidence of guilt and, even without certain recanted testimony, the jury would not have reached a different conclusion because the recanted testimony went to credibi
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    See id.; see also Leake, d at 536; Rhodes, d at 844; Morgan v. State , (concluding that “[t]rial tactics .
  • State v. Caldwell 803 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Caldwell 803 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2011
  • Hooper v. State 680 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2004
  • Hooper v. State 680 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2004
    In contrast, a case involving a key witness’s recanted trial testimony that went to the witness’s credibility as opposed to the defendant’s guilt.
  • Ferguson v. State 645 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2002
  • Ferguson v. State 645 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2002
    See, (denying new trial based on first prong); (denying new trial based on second prong).
  • Tsipouras v. State 567 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • Tsipouras v. State 567 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    -61 (Minn.1986) (acquittal of co-defendants not persuasive evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel).
  • State v. Smith 541 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Smith 541 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1996
    Cf., (defendant not entitled to new trial on basis of newly discovered evidence that state’s witness perjured self in testifying she received no benefit from state; jury would not reach different result on retrial).
  • Dunn v. State 499 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1993
  • Dunn v. State 499 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1993
    The trial court found no need for an evidentiary hearing because “the petition, files, records and affidavits conclusively show the petitioner is not entitled to relief,”
  • State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
    “Trial tactics, however, are not to be confused with competence.”
  • Marhoun v. State 451 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1990
  • Marhoun v. State 451 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1990
  • Berg v. State 403 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Berg v. State 403 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Sanders v. State 400 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Sanders v. State 400 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Jones 392 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Jones 392 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1986