Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Moot, 398 N.W.2d 21.

17 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(affirming a district court’s decision to revoke probation where “the presumptive sentence was commitment to prison and the downward departure was solely to permit one last attempt to succeed at treatment”), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(affirming probation revocation when district court granted a downward departure to permit offender a final attempt to succeed at treatment), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Fleming, d at 331 ( (affirming probation revocation when “presumptive sentence was commitment to prison and the downward departure was solely to permit one last attempt to succeed at treatment” )).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, (affirming probation revocation when defendant refused to comply with treatment program and participate in recovery), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Moot , review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
reatment at Teen Challenge, and you’ve sabotaged that.” In State v. Moot , this court affirmed probation revocation when the record demonstrated that “a downward dispositional departure [was ] the sole reason of affording appellant one last opportunity to succeed in treatment for chemical dependency,” but the probationer refused “to comply with the program and participate in his recovery.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Lenny Clyde White Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Lenny Clyde White Minn. Ct. App. 2017
aff’d on other grounds, review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Jarvaughn Douglas Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jarvaughn Douglas Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2016
17, 7 2016); (affirming revocation of probation after probationer’s failure to cooperate with treatment, when the district court made it clear that the presumptive sentence was commitment to prison and the downward departure was solely to permit “one last opportunity to succeed in treatment”), review deni
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 869 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 869 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(affirming probation revocation where district court “made it clear that the presumptive sentence was commitment to prison and the downward departure was solely to permit one last attempt to succeed at treatment”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Losh 694 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Losh 694 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(district court acts as factfinder by weighing witness credibility), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In Re the Welfare of D.T.H. 572 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1997