DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Webb, 440 N.W.2d 426.

854 citing documents.

  • Wright v. State 765 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 2009
    When reviewing the sufficiency of the evi *93 dence to support a conviction, we conduct “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.” ().
  • State v. Hersi 763 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Hersi 763 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Hurd 763 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Hurd 763 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2009
    When reviewing whether the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction, we conduct “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Fleck 763 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Fleck 763 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence requires “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Brown 758 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Brown 758 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Jorgenson 758 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Jorgenson 758 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Blevins 757 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Blevins 757 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. DeWalt 757 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. DeWalt 757 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    review denied (Minn. May 20, 2003).
  • State v. Johnson 756 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Johnson 756 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • In Re the Welfare of S.J.J. 755 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • In Re the Welfare of S.J.J. 755 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Outlaw 748 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Outlaw 748 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Morales-Mulato 744 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Morales-Mulato 744 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    In considering a claim of insufficient evidence, this court’s review “is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Jackson 741 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Jackson 741 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Ouellette 740 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Ouellette 740 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Otterstad 734 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Otterstad 734 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Morin 736 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Morin 736 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Crow 730 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Crow 730 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2007
    Our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is “limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Hager 727 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Hager 727 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Perry 725 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Perry 725 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Eakins 720 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Eakins 720 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Scanlon 719 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Scanlon 719 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2006
    In State v. Webb, we held that a ease made up of circumstantial evidence was insufficient to support a guilty verdict, despite the court’s statement that circumstantial evidence “is entitled to as much weight as other kinds of evidence.” -31 (Minn.1989).
  • State v. Mogler 719 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Mogler 719 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    In considering a claim of insufficient evidence, this court’s review is limited to a “painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, [is] sufficient to allow the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Pendleton 706 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2005