Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Webb, 440 N.W.2d 426.

854 citing documents.

State v. Pendleton 706 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2005
State v. Hinton 702 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Hinton 702 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In considering a claim of insufficient evidence, this court’s review “is limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State v. Clifton 701 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2005
State v. Clifton 701 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2005
Our review of a sufficiency of the evidence claim is “limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.” ().
State v. Holmes 701 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Holmes 701 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Welfare of C.J.W.J. 699 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Welfare of C.J.W.J. 699 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Levie 695 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Levie 695 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005
State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005
Our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is “limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.” ().
In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Mitchell 687 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Mitchell 687 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Birk 687 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Birk 687 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bolstad 686 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 2004
State v. Bolstad 686 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 2004
State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
On a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this court’s review is limited to a “painstaking analysis of the *57 record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State v. Myrland 681 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Myrland 681 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hadgu 681 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hadgu 681 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Olhausen 681 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2004
State v. Olhausen 681 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2004
State v. Fields 679 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2004
State v. Fields 679 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2004
Our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is “limited to a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
State v. Wright 679 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Wright 679 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Ali 679 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Ali 679 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bernardi 678 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bernardi 678 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Porter 674 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Porter 674 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. DeYoung 672 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. DeYoung 672 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Olhausen 669 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Olhausen 669 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kramer 668 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kramer 668 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Tracy 667 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Tracy 667 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Dominguez 663 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Dominguez 663 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 664 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2003