Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Cooper v. French, 460 N.W.2d 2.

1079 citing documents.

Daniel W Crandall, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State by Cooper v. French
American Family Insurance Company a/s/o Nicholas Oelke v. NB Electric, Inc. dba East Side Garage Doors, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
American Family Insurance Company a/s/o Nicholas Oelke v. NB Electric, Inc. dba East Side Garage Doors, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“On an appeal from summary judgment, [appellate courts] ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district court] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Daley Farm of Lewiston, L.L.P., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
ANALYSIS “On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district court] erred in [its] application of the law.”
A23-0484 Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0484 Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, -11 (Minn. 1990) (Yetka, J., plurality) (concluding that a landlord was entitled to a constitutional exemption from the MHRA); (holding that, “even if [relator’s] conduct did constitute a violation of the Minneapolis Civil Rights Ordinance, such conduct i
Andrew Ellis, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A19-0355 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
ANALYSIS “On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district court] erred in [its] 6 application of the law.” See State by Cooper v. French
Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
State by Cooper v. French , , 4 (Minn. 1990).
Jennissen v. City of Bloomington 904 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jennissen v. City of Bloomington 904 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Accounts Receivable Services, LLC, as Successor in Interest to Allina Health System, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Leslie Davis v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Leslie Davis v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
Paul J. Krause v. City of Elk River Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Paul J. Krause v. City of Elk River Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jon P. Hanbury, individually and as father and natural guardian of Andrew and Nick Hanbury v. American Family … 865 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jon P. Hanbury, individually and as father and natural guardian of Andrew and Nick Hanbury v. American Family … 865 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David Herzog v. Cottingham & Butler Insurance Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David Herzog v. Cottingham & Butler Insurance Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Katie Kaloustian v. Dakota Fence Co., Landscape Structures, Inc., Independent School District No. 152 of Clay County, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Katie Kaloustian v. Dakota Fence Co., Landscape Structures, Inc., Independent School District No. 152 of Clay County, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION On appeal from summary judgment, we ask “(1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the lower courts erred in their application of the law.”
Randall Dahler v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Randall Dahler v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nicole M. Spargur v. Freeborn County Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nicole M. Spargur v. Freeborn County Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Juan Edward Shariss v. City of Bloomington 852 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Juan Edward Shariss v. City of Bloomington 852 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
ANALYSIS “On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district court] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc. 840 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc. 840 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the [district court] erred in [its] application of the law.”
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Kellogg v. Finnegan 823 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Kellogg v. Finnegan 823 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Kastning v. State Farm Insurance Companies 821 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Kastning v. State Farm Insurance Companies 821 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Mitchell v. Smith 817 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Mitchell v. Smith 817 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Moen v. Sunstone Hotel Properties, Inc. 818 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Moen v. Sunstone Hotel Properties, Inc. 818 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. State 818 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. State 818 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 2012
Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 2012
“On appeal from summary judgment, we ask two questions: (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the lower courts erred in their application of the *915 law.”
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Earthsoils, Inc. 812 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2012