Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Cooper v. French, 460 N.W.2d 2.

1079 citing documents.

Semler Construction, Inc. v. City of Hanover 667 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Lindberg v. Fasching 667 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan Council 667 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Doe v. F.P., Diocese of Winona 667 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Concepts 667 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Concepts 667 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 665 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Frerichs Construction Co. v. Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust 666 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Frerichs Construction Co. v. Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust 666 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 665 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. 671 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. 671 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
This court asks two questions on an appeal from summary judgment: “(1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the lower courts erred in their application of the law.” (citation omitted).
Duluth Superior Erection, Inc. v. Concrete Restorers, Inc. 665 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Duluth Superior Erection, Inc. v. Concrete Restorers, Inc. 665 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hebrink v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. 664 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Ehmke 664 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hebrink v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. 664 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Ehmke 664 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Guercio v. Production Automation Corp. 664 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Lecy v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. 663 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Lecy v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. 663 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Guercio v. Production Automation Corp. 664 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Turner v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 663 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Turner v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 663 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Longrie v. Luthen 662 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Longrie v. Luthen 662 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Williamson v. Prasciunas 661 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Williamson v. Prasciunas 661 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'n 658 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'n 658 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Prairie Island Indian Community v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety 658 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Prairie Island Indian Community v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety 658 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
On an appeal from summary judgment, this court asks two questions: “(1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the lower court erred in its application of the law.”
In Re Daniel 656 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2003
In Re Daniel 656 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2003
We address two questions when reviewing an order for summary judgment: “(1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the lower courts erred in their application of the law.”
Robins v. Conseco Finance Loan Company 656 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Robins v. Conseco Finance Loan Company 656 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
LaFee v. Winona County 655 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
LaFee v. Winona County 655 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
ANALYSIS On an appeal from summary judgment, we ask “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact” and “whether the lower courts erred in their application of the law.” (citation omitted).
Pestka v. County of Blue Earth 654 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Pestka v. County of Blue Earth 654 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Swenson v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. 653 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Swenson v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. 653 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
County of Benton v. Kismet Investors, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
County of Benton v. Kismet Investors, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schmitt 651 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schmitt 651 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
We review appeals from grants of summary judgment to determine “(1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and (2) whether the lower courts erred in their application of the law.” (citation omitted); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Minnesotans for Responsible Recreation v. Department of Natural Resources 651 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Minnesotans for Responsible Recreation v. Department of Natural Resources 651 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2002