Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Barsness, 473 N.W.2d 828.

155 citing documents.

State v. Risk 598 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1999
Safety, (extending greater protection to criminal defendants under the Minnesota Constitution than extended by the Court’s interpretation of the Sixth Amendment).
Fehler v. Commissioner of Public Safety 591 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Wicklund 589 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1999
Safety, -32 (Minn.1991).
Baker v. State 590 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1999
Safety, -38 (Minn. 1991) (prospectively applying decision ruling statute unconstitutional to the extent that statute denied motorists the right to consult with an attorney before deciding whether to submit to blood alcohol testing); McDonnell v. Comm'r of Pub.
Linde v. Commissioner of Public Safety 586 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Dumas 587 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Slette 585 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Moe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 574 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Safety, (holding driver has right to counsel prior to deciding whether to submit to testing).
STATE, CITY OF BELLE PLAINE v. Stradcutter 568 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(holding that driver has right to consult with counsel prior to chemical testing under the Minnesota Constitution).
Duff v. Commissioner of Public Safety 560 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hotchkiss v. Commissioner of Public Safety 553 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Haveri v. Commissioner of Public Safety 552 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Gergen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 548 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Safety, (holding that right to counsel under implied consent statute is limited because of the “evanescent nature of alcohol”); see Minn. Const. art. I, § 6 (“In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right * ⅝ * to have the assistance of counsel in his defense.”).
Palme v. Commissioner of Public Safety 541 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Women of the State v. Gomez 542 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1995
Safety, (right to counsel at the chemical testing stage of a DWI proceeding); (adopting stricter equal protection rational basis standard than federal courts); (religious liberties); (Minn
McNaughton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 536 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Spilde 536 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Hanson 532 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safety, in which the supreme court noted that driver’s license revocation “has, in most instances, the same impact as the traditional criminal sanctions of a fine and imprisonment.” Id.
State v. Gilmartin 535 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Umphlett v. Commissioner of Public Safety 533 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. McKenzie 532 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1995
Acknowledging that there is no violation of the jury requirements of the United States Constitution, 9 McKenzie urges us to inter *221 pret the Minnesota Constitution to provide additional constitutional protection, as we have, for example, Friedman v. Comm’r. of Public Safety
State v. Nielsen 530 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Ruffenach v. Commissioner of Public Safety 528 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safety, (“[a]n attorney, not a police officer, is the appropriate source of legal advice”).
Davis v. Commissioner of Public Safety 517 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1994
This case, 1 involving consolidated appeals, grew out of the legislature’s response to this court’s
State v. Jones 518 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Followed State v. Jones 518 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Christiansen 515 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Davis v. Commissioner of Public Safety 509 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Mulvaney v. Commissioner of Public Safety 509 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. White 504 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1993
Safety, was violated by the state’s failure to inform him that he would be able to consult with an attorney at state expense.
Delmore v. Commissioner of Public Safety 499 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Warner v. Commissioner of Public Safety 498 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Lindberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 498 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Safety, does not require that a police officer advise a driver of the right to counsel after testing when the officer has already advised the driver of the right to counsel before testing.
State v. Karau 496 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Safety, (under Minn. Const. art. I, § 6, an individual has a right upon request to a reasonable opportunity to obtain legal advice before submitting to chemical testing).
State v. Condon 497 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Commissioner of Public Safety v. Campbell 494 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1992
We granted the petition of the commissioner of public safety for review of the court of appeals’ decision in this cáse in order to resolve a
State v. White 493 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
ANALYSIS White argues that the state constitutional right to counsel, is denied to an indigent driver unless the driver is informed that an attorney is available at no cost.
State v. Fortman 493 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Clausen 493 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1992
They are free to interpret their own law, however, so as to provide greater protection for individual rights than that which the federal Constitution minimally mandates.” (citing PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 81 , 100 S.Ct.
Dufloth v. Commissioner of Public Safety 492 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Campbell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 489 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Catlin v. Commissioner of Public Safety 490 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Parsons v. Commissioner of Public Safety 488 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Safety, the Supreme Court addressed the driver’s right to counsel under Minn. Const, art. I, § 6, and held an individual has a limited right to obtain legal advice before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing.
Kuhn v. Commissioner of Public Safety 488 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Przymus v. Commissioner of Public Safety 488 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Safety, the supreme court held that under Minn. Const, art. I, § 6, an individual has the right to obtain legal advice before deciding whether to undergo testing to determine alcohol concentration.
State v. Thesing 485 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Safety, (driver claiming denial of right to counsel must have challenged the denial in trial court before June 7, 1991).
State v. Simon 485 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Safety, (holding the decision whether to submit to chemical testing was a critical stage and thus, the right to counsel did attach under art. I, § 6 of the Minnesota Constitution).
Sommers v. Commissioner of Public Safety 482 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Safety, and McDonnell v. Commissioner of Pub.
State v. Stumpf 481 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Safety, McDonnell v. Commissioner of Pub.
Pahlen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 482 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1992

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by