Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11, 459 N.W.2d 671.

165 citing documents.

Montplaisir v. Independent School District No. 23 779 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
No. 11, (“Constitutional principles of separate governmental powers require that the judiciary refrain from a de novo review of administrative decisions.”).
Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. 763 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. 763 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
No. 11, (applying the principle of separation of powers to school districts).
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
No. 11, -76 (Minn.1990) (holding in context of reviewing teacher-dismissal decisions that “record” consists of proceedings and actions of school board).
In Re Brittain 724 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 2006
In Re Brittain 724 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 2006
No. 11, (discussing use of remand "`to permit further evidence to be taken or additional findings to be made in accordance with the applicable law'" (citation omitted)).
Lam v. City of St. Paul 714 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Lam v. City of St. Paul 714 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
No. 11, (applying this standard to decision of a school board).
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Cambridge 693 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2005
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Cambridge 693 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2005
In Re the Appeal of Rocheleau 686 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Appeal of Rocheleau 686 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
No. 11, -75 (Minn.1990)).
Aaa Striping v. Mn. Dot 681 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
AAA Striping Service Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 681 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Aaa Striping v. Mn. Dot 681 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
No. 11, -78 (Minn.1990) (concluding that where a writ of certiorari is the appropriate method to obtain review, district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to decide declaratory judgment action).
AAA Striping Service Co. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 681 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
No. 11, -78 (Minn.1990) (concluding that where a writ of certiorari is the appropriate method to obtain review, district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to decide declaratory judgment action).
Hinckley v. School Board of Independent School District No. 2167 678 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Hinckley v. School Board of Independent School District No. 2167 678 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 675 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 675 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In the Matter of Revocation of the Family Child Care License of Gail Burke 666 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In the Matter of Revocation of the Family Child Care License of Gail Burke 666 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
No. 11, -75 (Minn.1990).
Saif Food Market v. Commissioner, State, Department of Health 664 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Saif Food Market v. Commissioner, State, Department of Health 664 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
County of Martin v. Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust 658 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
County of Martin v. Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust 658 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
No. 11, (addressing declaratory-judgment action brought by teacher to decide continuing contract-right dispute); (addressing declaratory-judgment action filed by state to determine whether state troopers were entitled to defense or indemnification from sta
Walther v. Lundberg 654 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Walther v. Lundberg 654 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
No. 11, -74 (Minn.1990) (involving the appeal of *32 a school board decision not to reinstate a teacher); (involving the appeal of the county’s decision to terminate nursing home employee).
Savre v. Independent School District No. 283 642 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Savre v. Independent School District No. 283 642 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No. 11, (citation omitted).
Thomas v. Independent School District No. 2142 639 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Thomas v. Independent School District No. 2142 639 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No. 11, ("[T]he proper and only method of appealing school board decisions on teacher related matters is by writ of certiorari.”).
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 633 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 633 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
No. 11, 678 (Minn.1990).
Maye v. University of Minnesota 615 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Maye v. University of Minnesota 615 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
No. 11, (applying separation of powers to school districts).
Rasmussen v. Sauer 597 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Rasmussen v. Sauer 597 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
No. 11, (exclusive method for appealing school board’s decision to terminate teacher by writ of certiorari to court of appeals) (Minn.1990); Clark v. Independent Sch.
Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 594 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 594 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
No. 11, (involving termination of teacher); Mowry, d at 720 (termination of police reserve unit member).
Washington v. Independent School District No. 625 590 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Washington v. Independent School District No. 625 590 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re Dakota Telecommunications Group 590 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re Dakota Telecommunications Group 590 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144 577 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1998