Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11, 459 N.W.2d 671.

165 citing documents.

Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144 577 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625 574 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625 574 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Board of Education 567 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Board of Education 567 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
No. 11, respondents argue that all school board decisions are reviewable only by certiorari, regardless of the character of the decision.
Mowry v. Young 565 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Mowry v. Young 565 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Heideman v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 555 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Heideman v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 555 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(citing Dokmo v. Independent School Dish No. 11, ) (when an administrative body exercises discretion in terminating an employee, the termination decision is quasi-judicial in nature and reviewable by certio-rari).
Willis v. County of Sherburne 555 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1996
Willis v. County of Sherburne 555 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1996
No. 11, and applied in Dietz , to include claims of defamation and discrimination arising out of the discharge of an employee of a local government.
Clark v. Independent School District No. 834 553 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Clark v. Independent School District No. 834 553 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
No. 11, Sellin v. City of Duluth, 248 Minn. 333, 337-38
Palmer v. Independent School District No. 917 547 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Palmer v. Independent School District No. 917 547 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Senior v. City of Edina 547 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Senior v. City of Edina 547 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
No. 11, -75 (Minn.1990).
Toby's of Alexandria, Inc. v. County of Douglas 545 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Toby's of Alexandria, Inc. v. County of Douglas 545 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 544 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1996
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 544 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1996
Larson v. New Richland Care Center 538 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Larson v. New Richland Care Center 538 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
No. 11, (holding teacher could only challenge employment termination by writ of certiorari, not in district court) (citing Roseville Educ.
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 538 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 538 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Zuehlke v. Independent School District No. 316 538 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Zuehlke v. Independent School District No. 316 538 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 532 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n 532 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
No. 11, (applying this standard of review to school board decision).
Micius v. St. Paul City Council 524 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Pierce v. Otter Tail County 524 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Pierce v. Otter Tail County 524 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
No. 11, -78 (Minn.1990).
Micius v. St. Paul City Council 524 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
No. 11, Anoka-Hennepin, -74 (Minn.1990) (petitioning court of appeals for writ of .certiorari only method to obtain review of school board’s decision on teacher related .matters).
Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112 515 N.W.2d 615 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112 515 N.W.2d 615 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
No. 11 Anoka-Hennepin, (Wahl, J., dissenting) (main purpose of teacher tenure law is to provide stable and permanent employment to teachers who have proven their ability to teach).
Stadum v. Norman County 508 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Stadum v. Norman County 508 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cloud v. Independent School District No. 38 508 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cloud v. Independent School District No. 38 508 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
No. 11, -76 (Minn.1990).
McClaine v. Independent School District No. 16 503 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McClaine v. Independent School District No. 16 503 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Dietz v. Dodge County 487 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1992
Dietz v. Dodge County 487 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1992
On petition of Dodge County and its board of commissioners, we consider only the question of whether, consistent with the policies announced in our decision in Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11, a petition for a writ of certiorari provides the exclusive means by which an employee can secure judicial review of the county’s employment termination decision.
In Re the Demotion of Dillenberger 486 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Demotion of Dillenberger 486 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In re the Placement of Johnson 484 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1992
In re the Placement of Johnson 484 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1992
Neighborhood School Coalition v. Independent School District No. 279 484 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by