Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Steinbuch, 514 N.W.2d 793.

67 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(explaining that it is well -settled in Minnesota that it is within the province of the jury to determine the credibility and weight to be given to the testimony of any individual witness).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Plevell 889 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Plevell 889 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Probable cause for a grand jury indictment depends on “whether the evidence worthy of consideration * * * brings the charge against the prisoner within reasonable probability.” (quoting State v. 4 Florence, 306 Minn. 442, 446, ).
State v. Lopez 778 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 2010
State v. Lopez 778 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 2010
P. 2.01; (citing State v. Florence, 306 Minn. 442 , ).
State v. Sanders 775 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 2009
State v. Sanders 775 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 2009
State v. Riddley 776 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 2009
State v. Riddley 776 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 2009
State v. Buckingham 772 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 2009
State v. Buckingham 772 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 2009
State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005
State v. DeRosier 695 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 2005
But a homicide victim’s state of mind regarding the defendant may become relevant “where the defendant raises the defense of accident, suicide, or self-defense.” (); (concluding that statements that homicide victim was going to take her girls and leave was relevant to rebut defendant’s claim that the victim, his wife, murdered his daughter and step-daughter).
State v. Eibensteiner 690 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Eibensteiner 690 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(“Based on all the evidence presented to the grand jury, we conclude that the state met its burden of establishing probable cause.”); (“The trial court considered the grand jury transcript and found sufficient evidence to support the indictment.”); Ter
State v. Olhausen 681 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2004
State v. Olhausen 681 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2004
State v. Moua 678 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 2004
State v. Moua 678 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 2004
State v. Asfeld 662 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 2003
State v. Asfeld 662 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 2003
State v. Flicek 657 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Flicek 657 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Probable cause exists if “evidence worthy of consideration * * * brings the charge * * * within a reasonable probability.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Carney 649 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 2002
State v. Carney 649 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 2002
State v. Hatfield 639 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 2002
State v. Hatfield 639 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 2002
-99 (Minn.1994); see also Walen, d at 749-50 .
State v. Matelski 622 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Matelski 622 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Larson 605 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2000
State v. Larson 605 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2000
State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
Davis v. State 595 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1999
Davis v. State 595 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1999
Intent may be proved by circumstantial evidence including the defendant's conduct, *526 and the character of the assault
State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
Steinbuch v. State 589 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1999
Steinbuch v. State 589 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1999
State v. Lynch 590 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
State v. Lynch 590 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
State v. Kennedy 585 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1998
State v. Kennedy 585 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1998
State v. Lahue 585 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1998
State v. Lahue 585 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1998