Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church, 527 N.W.2d 830.

108 citing documents.

Philip Ayeni, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Stengel, d at 383; see also McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
Allan N. Anderson, Jr., et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
7 See McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, (holding that an interlocutory order denying a motion for summary judgment based on the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act is immediately appealable because it implicates the district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction).
A23-0621 JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0621 JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Our appellate jurisdiction does not extend to the district court’s February 27, 2023 order to the extent that the district court denied USAPL’s summary-judgment motion because an order denying summary judgment generally is not appealable, see McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, and because the district court’s denial of USAPL’s motion does not support the order for an injunction, which is the original basis of the appeal, see Minn. R. Civ.
Deangelo Profit, Minn. 2023
McGowan v. Our Savior ’s Lutheran Church, (citing Hanson, 297 N.W.
Lisa Stone, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Similarly, in McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church , the supreme court held an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is immediately appealable because “no purpose is served by putting the parties or the court through the rigors of trial before that determination is made” if “the district court is without jurisdiction to proceed further.”
Madison Equities, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, e.g. , McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, -33 (Minn. 1995).
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew David Feeney. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, –33 (Minn. 1995).
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis 923 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 2019
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis 923 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 2019
McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church , , 832-34 (Minn. 1995).
Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
See McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church , , 832 (Minn. 1995) ("[I]mmediate appeal is permitted where a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied."); Hunt v. Nev.
David Forster, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
Kelly ex rel. Washburn v. Kraemer Construction, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 2017
Kelly ex rel. Washburn v. Kraemer Construction, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 2017
Kelly v. Kraemer Constr., Inc., WL 3961817 , at *2 (Minn. App. July 26, 2016); see McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, (“Where the [Workers’ Compensation] Act provides the employee’s exclusive remedy, the district courts have no jurisdiction.”).
Simon McCullough v. City of Red Wing Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Simon McCullough v. City of Red Wing Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, (quotation and citations omitted).
McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights, A14-1992 883 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 2016
McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights, A14-1992 883 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 2016
See McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
Kie Vang, and v. Joshua Paul Forsman, Ely Chamber of Commerce, City of Ely, Minnesota State Colleges and … 883 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kie Vang, and v. Joshua Paul Forsman, Ely Chamber of Commerce, City of Ely, Minnesota State Colleges and … 883 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights 868 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights 868 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, -32 (Minn. 1995).
Chad Schirmers v. County of Anoka Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Chad Schirmers v. County of Anoka Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.” McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
Richard O. Erickson v. Neatons' Crane Service, Inc., Capstone Homes, Inc., and Neatons' Crane Service, Inc., Third Party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Richard O. Erickson v. Neatons' Crane Service, Inc., Capstone Homes, Inc., and Neatons' Crane Service, Inc., Third Party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But, “an order denying summary judgment in an employee’s negligence action is immediately appealable when dismissal is sought based on the district court’s lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.” McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, -32 (Minn. 1995).
Douglas Speltz v. Interplastic Corporation, and third party v. Egan Company, Respondent./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Douglas Speltz v. Interplastic Corporation, and third party v. Egan Company, Respondent./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, -32 (Minn. 1995).
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
cmt.—1998 amendment; see McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
Beuning Family LP v. County of Stearns 817 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 2012
Aon Corp. v. Haskins 817 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Aon Corp. v. Haskins 817 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-89 , -300 (1969); see also McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, (motion for summary judgment based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction); -64 (Minn.1986) (motion for summary judgment based on governmental immunity).
State v. Ali 806 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 2011
State v. Ali 806 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 2011
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
ADVANCED DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. v. Jaime 774 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
ADVANCED DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. v. Jaime 774 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, -33 (Minn.1995).
Oberloh v. Johnson 768 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Oberloh v. Johnson 768 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
ollateral orders subject to immediate review because they fall within “that small class which finally determine claims of right, separable from, and collateral to, rights asserted in the action, too important to be denied review and too independent of the cause itself to require that appellate consideration be deferred until the whole case is adjudicated.” McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, (quotation omitted).
JW Ex Rel. BRW v. 287 INTER. DIST. 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
J.W. ex rel. B.R.W. v. 287 Intermediate District 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
JW Ex Rel. BRW v. 287 INTER. DIST. 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
*905 (citing Minn. R. Civ.App.
J.W. ex rel. B.R.W. v. 287 Intermediate District 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“An order denying a motion for summary judgment is not appealable unless the district court -certifies the question presented as important and doubtful.” McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, *905 (citing Minn. R. Civ.App.
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
The district court’s conclusion that it has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding — also not a final judgment — is similarly appealable under McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church