Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church, 527 N.W.2d 830.

108 citing documents.

Zank v. Larson 552 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1996
Zank v. Larson 552 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1996
l timing on traffic flow, the configuration of the intersection, driving behavior, changing climate conditions, and the uniformity of signal timing throughout the city are taken into account, with the primary concern the “safe and efficient movement of people and goods.” Ordinarily, interlocutory appeal is not available from the denial of summary judgment, McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, but an exception to this rule arises when the trial court denies summary judgment on the basis of st
O'Shaughnessy v. Smuckler Corp. 543 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
O'Shaughnessy v. Smuckler Corp. 543 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, (citing Min.R.Civ.App.P.
Larson v. New Richland Care Center 538 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Larson v. New Richland Care Center 538 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
Hallas v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. 541 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hallas v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. 541 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, (citing Minn.R.Civ.App.P.