Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite DLH, Inc. v. Russ, 566 N.W.2d 60.

761 citing documents.

Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Conversion is “an act of willful interference with personal property, done without lawful justification by which any person entitled thereto is deprived of use and possession.” DLH, (quotation omitted); see also Hildegarde, Inc. v. Wright, 244 Minn. 410, 413
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC 756 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Northeast Concrete Products, LLC 756 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
No genuine issue of material fact exists when “the nonmoving party presents evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue and which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH, see also Schroeder v. St.
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
and “is inappropriate when reasonable persons might draw different conclusions from the evidence presented,” DLH
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
No genuine issue of material fact exists when “ ‘the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.’ ” DLH, (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Superior Construction Services, Inc. v. Belton 749 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Superior Construction Services, Inc. v. Belton 749 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
No genuine issue of material fact exists if the record as a whole “could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.” DLH
Razink v. Krutzig 746 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Razink v. Krutzig 746 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 745 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 745 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
There is a genuine issue of material fact when the nonmoving party presents evidence that is “sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the non-moving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
State v. Deal 740 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2007
State v. Deal 740 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2007
See DLH, (stating that we look to federal law for guidance when interpreting our own rules, particularly when the language in the federal and state rules is identical).
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine fact issue for trial exists if “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quotation omitted).
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine issue of material fact exists when “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.” DLH, (quotation omitted).
Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C. 736 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 2007
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 734 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 734 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Sletto v. Wesley Construction, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Sletto v. Wesley Construction, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine issue of material fact exists if the evidence “merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue.” DLH
Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine issue of material fact exists when “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Gagliardi v. Ortho-Midwest, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Gagliardi v. Ortho-Midwest, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine issue of fact exists when “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quotation omitted).
Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc. 732 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc. 732 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine fact issue for trial exists if “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party....” DLH, (quotation omitted).
Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. 731 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. 731 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine issue for trial exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.” DLH, (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 730 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 730 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine issue for trial exists “[wjhere the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (alteration in original) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Curiskis v. City of Minneapolis 729 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Curiskis v. City of Minneapolis 729 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Borgersen v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. 729 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Borgersen v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. 729 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine issue for trial exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.” DLH, Inc. v. Russ (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 726 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 726 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine issue for trial exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quotation omitted).
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
No genuine issue of material fact exists when “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Meads v. Best Oil Co. 725 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Meads v. Best Oil Co. 725 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
There is no genuine issue of material fact when “ ‘the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.’ ” DLH, (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Rixmann v. City of Prior Lake 723 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rixmann v. City of Prior Lake 723 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
A genuine issue for trial *495 must be established by “substantial evidence,” and “the party resisting summary judgment must do more than rest on mere averments.” DLH, -71 (Minn.1997).
Peterson v. Johnson 720 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Peterson v. Johnson 720 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Stuedemann v. Nose 713 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Stuedemann v. Nose 713 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2006