Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite DLH, Inc. v. Russ, 566 N.W.2d 60.

761 citing documents.

Rasmussen v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 712 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rasmussen v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 712 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Northfield Care Center, Inc. v. Anderson 707 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Northfield Care Center, Inc. v. Anderson 707 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
There is no genuine issue of material fact if “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, *916 (quotation omitted).
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Gibson v. Trustees of the Minnesota State Basic Building Trades Fringe Benefits Funds 703 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Gibson v. Trustees of the Minnesota State Basic Building Trades Fringe Benefits Funds 703 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Zander v. State 703 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Zander v. State 703 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“The district court’s function on a motion for summary judgment is not to decide issues of fact, but solely to determine whether genuine factual issues exist.” DLH
Black v. Rimmer 700 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Fin Ag, Inc. v. Hufnagle, Inc. 700 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Black v. Rimmer 700 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Fin Ag, Inc. v. Hufnagle, Inc. 700 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
No genuine issue of material fact exists, however, *518 “when the nonmoving party presents evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue and which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 697 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Concept Properties, LLP v. City of Minnetrista 694 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Concept Properties, LLP v. City of Minnetrista 694 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
15,1998), or when “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party,” DLH, (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Allianz Insurance Co. v. PM Services of Eden Prairie, Inc. 691 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Allianz Insurance Co. v. PM Services of Eden Prairie, Inc. 691 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
There is no genuine issue of material fact when the record on the whole “could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.” DLH
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc. 689 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2004
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc. 689 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2004
Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLC 689 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLC 689 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
St. Louis Park Post No. 5632 v. City of St. Louis Park 687 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
St. Louis Park Post No. 5632 v. City of St. Louis Park 687 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 686 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 686 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
A genuine issue of material fact does not exist when “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH; (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Fedke v. City of Chaska 685 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Fedke v. City of Chaska 685 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” (alteration in original) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Pope County Board of Commissioners v. Pryzmus 682 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Pope County Board of Commissioners v. Pryzmus 682 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[wjhere the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party....” DLH, (quotation omitted).
City of Elko v. Abed 677 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
City of Elko v. Abed 677 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
The party opposing summary judgment “must do more than rest on mere averments.” DLH
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
Ass’n, , 355 n. 4 (Minn.2000); DLH
Schumacher v. Schumacher 676 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Schumacher v. Schumacher 676 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” (alteration in original).
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 674 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
WDSI, INC. v. County of Steele 672 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
WDSI, INC. v. County of Steele 672 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
ANALYSIS “The district courts function on a motion for summary judgment is not to decide issues of fact, but solely to determine whether genuine factual issues exist.” DLH
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Knudsen v. TRANPSORT LEASING/CONTRACT, INC. 672 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Knudsen v. TRANPSORT LEASING/CONTRACT, INC. 672 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“[T]here is no genuine issue of material fact for trial when the nonmoving party presents evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue and which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the non-moving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Eischen Cabinet Co. v. Hildebrandt 671 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2003