Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite DLH, Inc. v. Russ, 566 N.W.2d 60.

761 citing documents.

Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
A genuine issue of material fact exists when the nonmoving party presents evidence that creates a doubt as .to a factual issue that is “probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
Eischen Cabinet Co. v. Hildebrandt 671 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” (quotation omitted).
Independent School District No. 404 v. Castor 670 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Independent School District No. 404 v. Castor 670 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Edina Development Corporation v. Hurrle 670 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Edina Development Corporation v. Hurrle 670 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Forstrom 669 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bundy v. Holmquist 669 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Forstrom 669 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bundy v. Holmquist 669 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
There is no genuine issue of material fact “[wjhere the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quotation omitted).
Jackel v. Brower 668 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Jackel v. Brower 668 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
No genuine issue of material fact exists where “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, Inc., v. Russ, (quotation omitted).
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan Council 667 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan Council 667 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
A genuine issue of material fact exists when the non-moving party presents evidence that creates a doubt as to a factual issue that is “probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
Frerichs Construction Co. v. Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust 666 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Frerichs Construction Co. v. Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust 666 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bright Wood Corp. v. Bankers Standard Insurance Co. 665 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bright Wood Corp. v. Bankers Standard Insurance Co. 665 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (alteration in original) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Guercio v. Production Automation Corp. 664 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Guercio v. Production Automation Corp. 664 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
A genuine issue of material fact exists when the non-moving party presents evidence that creates a doubt as to a factual issue that is “probative with respect to an essential element- of the nonmoving party’s case to pérmit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
Williamson v. Prasciunas 661 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Williamson v. Prasciunas 661 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Conversion occurs where one willfully interferes with the personal property of another “without lawful justification,” depriving the lawful possessor of “use and possession.” DLH, Inc., v. Russ, (quotation and citation omitted).
Vlahos v. R & I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 658 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Vlahos v. R & I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 658 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
A material fact issue does not exist when the non-moving party presents evidence that only creates a “metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue,” not “sufficiently probative with respect to as essential element of the non-moving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
Robins v. Conseco Finance Loan Company 656 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Robins v. Conseco Finance Loan Company 656 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
No genuine is *244 sue of material fact exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.” DLH, (alteration in original) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
LaFee v. Winona County 655 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
LaFee v. Winona County 655 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[wjhere the record taken as a whole could *665 not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (alteration in original).
Schneider Ex Rel. Schneider v. Erickson 654 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Schneider Ex Rel. Schneider v. Erickson 654 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
County of Benton v. Kismet Investors, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
County of Benton v. Kismet Investors, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (alteration in original) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Stiele Ex Rel. Gladieux v. City of Crystal 646 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Stiele Ex Rel. Gladieux v. City of Crystal 646 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” (alteration in original) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Gradjelick v. Hance 646 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2002
Gradjelick v. Hance 646 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2002
Heuer v. County of Aitkin 645 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Heuer v. County of Aitkin 645 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[wjhere the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quoting Matsushita Elec.
L.M. Ex Rel. S. v. Karlson 646 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
L.M. Ex Rel. S. v. Karlson 646 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No genuine issue of material facts exists “[wjhere the *542 record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.” DLH, (alteration in original) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Dakota County v. BWBR Architects, Inc. 645 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Dakota County v. BWBR Architects, Inc. 645 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Daniel for the Establishment of Cartway 644 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Daniel for the Establishment of Cartway 644 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
P. 56.05 (party resisting summary-judgment motion must present specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial); DLH, (party resisting summary judgment must do more than rest on mere averments; a genuine issue must be established by substantial evidence).
State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 644 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 644 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[wjhere the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (alteration in original) (quoting Matsushita Elec.
Mohler v. City of St. Louis Park 643 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mohler v. City of St. Louis Park 643 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
No genuine issue of material fact exists where “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quotation omitted).