Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Shirk v. Shirk, 561 N.W.2d 519.

168 citing documents.

Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Evans v. Evans 672 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Evans v. Evans 672 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
2, and that once stipulation merges into judgment, “finality becomes of central importance.”
Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-22 (Minn.1997) (addressing withdrawal from and vacation of dissolution stipulations).
Marriage of Krech v. Krech 624 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Krech v. Krech 624 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(“sole relief from the judgment and decree lies in meeting the requirements of Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Harding v. Harding 620 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Harding v. Harding 620 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
When a divorce judgment is entered pursuant to a stipulation, the stipulation merges into the judgment and decree and “finality becomes of central importance.”
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Stipulations are a judicially-favored means of simplifying and expediting dissolution litigation and, for this reason, are “accorded the sanctity of binding contracts.”
Marriage of Frauenshuh v. Giese 599 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1999
Marriage of Pfleiderer v. Pfleiderer 591 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Marriage of Pfleiderer v. Pfleiderer 591 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Marriage of Hestekin v. Hestekin 587 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Hestekin v. Hestekin 587 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1998