Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., 534 N.W.2d 734.

21 citing documents.

McLaughlin’s Detroit Lakes, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A judgment based on a settlement agreement is a final judgment on the merits, but only with respect to the issues and claims actually settled.” Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., n.1 (Minn. App. 1995), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
North Loop Downtown, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(holdi ng that release “from all claims” barred all of plaintiff’s claims), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Thomas Sullivan, as guardian and conservator for Marc L. Beeman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis and Kaplan, P.A., (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Busad Kheyre, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Consequently, a “[d]ismissal for lack of standing is not a judgment on the merits.” Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., n.1 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Petition of CitiMortgage, Inc., a New York corporation, relating to Certificate of Title … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
n.1 (Minn. App. 1995) (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Maria F. Olson v. James Scott Kent Peoples National Bank of Mora Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Maria F. Olson v. James Scott Kent Peoples National Bank of Mora Minn. Ct. App. 2016
aria Olson was somehow mistaken as to whether McKinnis was included within the release, “[u]nilateral mistake as to the scope of a release will not avoid its plain language; appellants must come forward with evidence that there was a mutual mistake regarding the intended scope of the releases or that respondents induced the mistake in some way.” Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
with respect to those issues and claims actually settled.” Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., n.1 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Petition of Prime Security Bank For a New Certificate of Title After Mortgage … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Petition of Prime Security Bank For a New Certificate of Title After Mortgage … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellants rely on Canal Capital Corp. v. Valley Pride Pack, Inc., 169 F.3d 508, 514 (8th Cir. 1999), McCarney v. Ford Motor Co., 657 F.2d 230, 234 (8th Cir. 1981), and Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Nelson v. Holland 776 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Nelson v. Holland 776 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
§ 524.3-712 (2008); Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Barth v. Stenwick 761 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Barth v. Stenwick 761 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., , 736 n. 1 (Minn.App.1995) (determining that collateral estoppel does not preclude the litigation of issues that were not addressed in a settlement agreement), review denied (Minn. Sept.
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 745 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 745 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., *115 (citing Lucas, 364 P.2d at 687-88 ), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Francis v. Piper 597 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Francis v. Piper 597 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
at 5-6 (determining third party was not an intended beneficiary and not reaching multi-factor analysis); Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O’Connor & Hannan, (determining third party may be an intended beneficiary and not reaching multi-factor analysis); Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A., (determining third party was not an intended beneficiary before considering two factors of multi-factor analysis), revieio denied (Minn. Sept.