Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minneapolis Public Housing Authority v. Lor, 591 N.W.2d 700.
-
Hegenes Properties, LLC v. Michelle Rodriguez, John Doe
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Lor, d 700, 704 (Minn. 1999) (explaining that “a lease is a form of contract”).
-
Benchmark Investments, LLC, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Lor, d 700, 704 (Minn. 1999).
-
Sunrise Estates, a MN Limited Partnership, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Lor, (footnote omitted).
-
Larry Nettles, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Lor, (footnotes omitted).
- Little Earth of United Tribes Housing Corp, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Minn. 2021
-
Bob Springer, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Lor, ( footnotes omitted).
-
Tad Ware & Company, Inc., Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Lor , (footnotes omitted) .
- ARU Properties, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rohde 820 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2012
-
Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rohde
820 N.W.2d 1
Minn. 2012
v. Lor, (explaining that “a lease is a form of contract”).
- Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 790 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2010
- Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 790 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2010
- Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Noble 763 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 2009
- Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Noble 763 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 2009
- TIMELINE, LLC v. Williams Holdings 3, LLC 698 N.W.2d 181 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- TIMELINE, LLC v. Williams Holdings 3, LLC 698 N.W.2d 181 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Isaacs v. American Iron & Steel Co. 690 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Isaacs v. American Iron & Steel Co. 690 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc. 672 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.
672 N.W.2d 578
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
v. Lor, (footnotes omitted)); see Kauffman Stewart, (stating that when a contract is unambiguous, it is improper for courts to go beyond the clear language of the contract).
- Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc. 670 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc.
670 N.W.2d 449
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating, “Unambiguous contract language must be given its plain and ordinary meaning, and shall be enforced by courts even if the result is harsh.”).
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co. 666 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 2003
-
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
666 N.W.2d 339
Minn. 2003
v. Lor, (footnotes omitted).
- Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc. 666 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2003
-
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
666 N.W.2d 320
Minn. 2003
v. Lor, (citing Bob *324 Useldinger & Sons, ).
- Manor v. Gales 649 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Manor v. Gales
649 N.W.2d 892
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
v. Lor, (independently reviewing the import of HUD regulations).
- DeSalle v. Gibraltar Title Agency L.L.C. 621 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000
- DeSalle v. Gibraltar Title Agency L.L.C. 621 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Sieve v. Rosar 613 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Sieve v. Rosar 613 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Denman v. Gans 607 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Denman v. Gans 607 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Shaner v. Independent School District No. 2884 604 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Shaner v. Independent School District No. 2884 604 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2000