Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Handicraft Block Ltd. Partnership v. City of Minneapolis, 611 N.W.2d 16.

38 citing documents.

Alex Lancaster, Relator v. Department of Human Services Minn. 2025
Alex Lancaster, Relator v. Department of Human Services Minn. 2025
of Comm’rs, 574 n.5 (Minn. 2000) (providing that a county board’s “[r]uling on a conditional use permit application is a quasi-judicial act” because “the legislature has not provided for judicial review of zoning decisions of county boards in the district court as it has for zoning decisions” by other governing bodies); Handicraft Block Ltd. P’–24 (Minn. 2000) (holding that the proceedings before the city council to select buildings for heritage preservation were quasi-judicial); –42 (Minn. 2012
Thomas Behrends, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
1103 4th St SE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Handicraft Block Ltd. P’ (“[T]he three indicia of quasi-judicial actions can be summarized as follows: (1) investigation into a disputed claim and weighing of evidentiary facts; (2) application of those facts to a prescribed standard; and (3) a binding decision regarding the disputed claim.” (citation omitted)); see also
In re: Demolition of First Church of Christ Scientist, 614 15th Street East (PLAN10644). Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Handicraft Block Ltd. P’ (“[T]he three indicia of quasi-judicial actions can be summarized as follows: (1) investigation into a disputed claim and weighing of evidentiary facts; (2) application of those facts to a prescribed standard; and (3) a binding decision regarding the disputed claim.”) (citation omitted).
Eric Reetz, Minn. 2021
See Handicraft Block Ltd. P’–21 (Minn. 2000).
Paul King, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc. 868 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc. 868 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
at 539 ; Handicraft Block Ltd. P’ (holding that a decision by a city with all three characteristics of a quasi-judicial decision was reviewable only by the court of appeals).
500, LLC v. City of Minneapolis 837 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 2013
500, LLC v. City of Minneapolis 837 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 2013
hearing[s] on a conditional use permit directed at a specific property and related to specific property rights.” Handicraft Block Ltd. P’ see also Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass’n v. City of Minneapolis, -26 (Minn.2003) (affirming a city’s decision to designate a property as historic, even though some findings originated with the city’s zoning and planning committee, rather than the city’s heritage-preservation commiss
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 818 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 2012
See Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Cambridge 693 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2005
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Cambridge 693 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2005
No. 695, *429 Handicraft Block Ltd. P’-20 (Minn.2000).
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis 667 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2003
Dorman v. Steffen 666 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Dorman v. Steffen 666 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
County of Martin v. Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust 658 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
County of Martin v. Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust 658 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis 653 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis 653 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
Johnson v. Murray 648 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 2002
Johnson v. Murray 648 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 2002
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
Carlson v. Chermak 639 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Carlson v. Chermak 639 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
Burkstrand v. Burkstrand 632 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2001
Burkstrand v. Burkstrand 632 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2001
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
Soo Line Railroad v. City of Minneapolis 625 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Soo Line Railroad v. City of Minneapolis 625 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Ladwig v. Chatters 623 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Ladwig v. Chatters 623 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’
City of Hibbing v. Baratto 620 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Hibbing v. Baratto 620 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Handicraft Block Ltd. P’