Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Powers, 654 N.W.2d 667.

157 citing documents.

Jackson v. State 817 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2012
Jackson v. State 817 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2012
("Issues not addressed by a party's brief are considered *722 waived.
State v. Finnegan 784 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2010
State v. Jackson 773 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 2009
State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
State v. Jackson 773 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 2009
-76 (Minn.2003) (holding that the extended duration of multiple trials favored joinder).
State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
-76 (Minn.2003) (holding that the extended duration of multiple trials favored joinder).
Holt v. State 772 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
Holt v. State 772 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
State v. Romine 757 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Romine 757 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(considering relative duration of comment in determining whether it deprived defendant of fair trial).
State v. Lehman 749 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Lehman 749 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Powers v. State 731 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2007
Powers v. State 731 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2007
Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
State v. Ramey 721 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2006
State v. Ramey 721 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2006
State v. Anderson 720 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Anderson 720 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
This court will reverse a conviction due to prosecutorial misconduct at trial only if the misconduct, “when considered in light of the whole trial, impaired the defendant’s right to a fair trial.”
State v. Mayhorn 720 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
State v. Mayhorn 720 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
(emphasis added; internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
State v. Wright 719 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2006
State v. Wright 719 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2006
State v. Mogler 719 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Mogler 719 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(holding that defendant forfeits right to have issue considered on appeal when he fails to object to misconduct at trial).
State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In reviewing claims of prosecutorial misconduct, we “will reverse only if the misconduct, when considered in light of the whole trial, impaired the defendant’s right to a fair trial.”
In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Hobbs 713 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Welfare of D.D.R. 713 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
This court will reverse a conviction due to prosecutorial misconduct at trial only if the misconduct, “when considered in light of the whole trial, impaired the defendant’s right to- a fair trial.”
State v. Hobbs 713 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
This court will reverse a conviction due to pros-ecutorial misconduct at trial only if the misconduct, “when considered in light of the whole trial, impaired the defendant’s right to a fair trial.”
State v. Young 710 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2006
State v. Young 710 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2006
State v. Ahmed 708 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Ahmed 708 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
This court will reverse a conviction due to prosecutorial misconduct at trial only if the misconduct, “when considered in light of the whole trial, impaired the defendant’s right to a fair trial.”
State v. Swanson 707 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2006
State v. Swanson 707 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2006
State v. Morton 701 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2005
State v. Clifton 701 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2005
State v. Clifton 701 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2005
This court will grant a new trial *799 only when “the misconduct, when considered in light of the whole trial, impaired the defendant’s right to a fair trial.” (-28 (Minn.2000)).
State v. Morton 701 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2005
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
Powers v. State 695 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 2005
Powers v. State 695 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 2005
Powers v. State 688 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 2004
Powers v. State 688 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 2004
State v. Bailey 677 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2004