Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBois, 335 N.W.2d 503.
-
Marriage of Koenen v. Koenen
413 N.W.2d 280
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The trial court’s decision must be affirmed if it has a “reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle.”
-
Marriage of Southwell v. Southwell
413 N.W.2d 580
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The trial court’s division of property must be affirmed if the court’s determination “has a reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle.”
- Marriage of Larson v. Larson 412 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Larson v. Larson 412 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Huston v. Huston 412 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Huston v. Huston 412 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Melina v. Melina 411 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Melina v. Melina 411 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Batsell v. Batsell 410 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Marriage of Batsell v. Batsell
410 N.W.2d 14
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The division of property must be affirmed if it has a “reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle.” -83 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) ().
- Marriage of Meyers v. Meyers 409 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Meyers v. Meyers 409 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Cisek v. Cisek 409 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Hanson v. Hanson 403 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Worden v. Worden 403 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Hanson v. Hanson 403 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Worden v. Worden 403 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Weikle v. Weikle 403 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Lossing v. Lossing 403 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Lossing v. Lossing 403 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Weikle v. Weikle 403 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Green v. Green 402 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Green v. Green 402 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Strauch v. Strauch 401 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Marriage of Strauch v. Strauch
401 N.W.2d 444
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
for rev. denied (Minn. May 29, 1986) ().
- Marriage of Peaslee v. Peaslee 400 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Peaslee v. Peaslee 400 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Stromberg v. Stromberg 397 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Gustafson v. Gustafson 396 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Stromberg v. Stromberg 397 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Marriage of Gustafson v. Gustafson
396 N.W.2d 911
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
If the determination has a reasonable and acceptable basis in fact, it must be affirmed.” ().
- Marriage of Crace v. Crace 396 N.W.2d 877 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Marriage of Crace v. Crace
396 N.W.2d 877
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(valuation and division of pension rights is generally a matter for the trial court’s discretion, citing Faus and Janssen).
- Maher v. Maher 393 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Maher v. Maher
393 N.W.2d 190
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The trial court’s division will be affirmed “if it has a reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle.” ().
- Marriage of Schelmeske v. Veit 390 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Schelmeske v. Veit 390 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Huckbody v. Freeburg 388 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Huckbody v. Freeburg 388 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Krogstad v. Krogstad 388 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Marriage of Krogstad v. Krogstad
388 N.W.2d 376
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
If the child support determination has a “reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle, this court will and must affirm.” Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418
- Maxson v. Derence 384 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Maxson v. Derence 384 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Justis v. Justis 384 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Thompson v. Newman 383 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Thompson v. Newman 383 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Larson v. Larson 383 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Hoppenrath v. Cullen 383 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986