Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBois, 335 N.W.2d 503.

143 citing documents.

Marriage of Hoppenrath v. Cullen 383 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 383 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Lindberg v. Lindberg 379 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 376 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 376 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Its decision will be affirmed if it has a “reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle.” -83 , (Minn.Ct.App.1984) ().
S.G.K. v. K.S.K. 374 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sgk v. Ksk 374 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sgk v. Ksk 374 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
S.G.K. v. K.S.K. 374 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Esposito v. Esposito 371 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Esposito v. Esposito 371 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
On appeal, we must affirm the trial court decision if it “has a reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle.”
Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen 368 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Frederiksen v. Frederiksen 368 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Ronay v. Ronay 369 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tucker v. Tucker 368 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Ronay v. Ronay 369 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tucker v. Tucker 368 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Durand v. Durand 367 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Durand v. Durand 367 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hein v. Hein 366 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hein v. Hein 366 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Taflin v. Taflin 366 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Novick v. Novick 366 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Novick v. Novick 366 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Taflin v. Taflin 366 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Trebelhorn v. Uecker 362 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Trebelhorn v. Uecker 362 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The decision will be affirmed if it has a “reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle.” Kreidler, d at 782 -83 ().
Hedelius v. Hedelius 361 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hedelius v. Hedelius 361 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lukanen v. Lukanen 357 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lukanen v. Lukanen 357 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Dahlberg v. Dahlberg 358 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Dahlberg v. Dahlberg 358 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Its decision will be affirmed if it has a “reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle.”
Marriage of Oberle v. Oberle 355 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Oberle v. Oberle 355 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Burr v. Burr 353 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Burr v. Burr 353 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kottke v. Kottke 353 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kottke v. Kottke 353 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kirby v. Kirby 348 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kirby v. Kirby 348 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kreidler v. Kreidler 348 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kreidler v. Kreidler 348 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by