Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Stafford, 340 N.W.2d 669.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[T]he nose of a person is a bodily member.”
- Bradford Cain Dopkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Bradford Cain Dopkins v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(declining to decide whether great bodily harm is inflicted if one knocks someone out briefly); (“An individual who assaults another, causing temporary loss of consciousness, has inflicted substantial bodily harm and is guilty of third- degre
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In State v. Stafford, the supreme court stated that, “[a]rguably, ‘great bodily harm’ is inflicted if one knocks someone out briefly.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, (“Arguably, ‘great bodily harm’ is inflicted if one knocks someone out briefly .
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, e.g., State v. Stafford , (holding that a fractured nose constituted great bodily harm and that great bodily harm is “[a]rguably .
- State of Minnesota v. Patrick Michael Aleman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Patrick Michael Aleman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Arguably, 7 great bodily harm is inflicted if one knocks someone out briefly.” (quotation omitted)); (concluding that sufficient evidence existed to find that the victim suffered great bodily harm whe
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jerard Swenson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jerard Swenson
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Arguably, ‘great bodily harm’ is inflicted if one knocks someone out briefly.”); (concluding that there was sufficient evidence to justify finding that the victim suffered great bodily harm when she was found unconscious and on the verge of shock
- State v. Weyaus 836 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
State v. Weyaus
836 N.W.2d 579
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(noting without deciding that, “[ajrguably, ‘great bodily harm’ is inflicted if one knocks someone out briefly”); (Minn.App.
- State v. Streiff 673 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2004
-
State v. Streiff
673 N.W.2d 831
Minn. 2004
2 B. Case Laio Under Rule 15.07 we held that it was error for the district court to accept a plea to a lesser offense where the prosecutor’s offer of proof demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that the state could withstand a motion to dismiss on the charged offense.
- State v. Larkin 620 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
State v. Larkin
620 N.W.2d 335
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In State v. Stafford, the supreme court stated, “Arguably, ‘great bodily harm’ is inflicted if one knocks someone out brief *337 ly.” 1 ().
- State v. Barner 510 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1993
-
State v. Barner
510 N.W.2d 202
Minn. 1993
y injury which creates a high probability of death, or which causes serious permanent disfigurement, or which causes a permanent or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ or other serious bodily harm.” Relevant decisions of this court include: State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309
- State v. Favre 428 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. Favre
428 N.W.2d 828
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
671 n. 2 (Minn.1983) (“We do not believe that there is any manifest injustice in requiring defendant to stand trial on the charged offense in this case.”); (“The reasons cited by the trial court in this case [unconstitutionality, incorrectness of state’s po
- State v. Hyatt 402 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Hyatt 402 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Currie 400 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Currie
400 N.W.2d 361
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
6, 1985) (finding factual basis for guilty plea where victim lost a tooth); (sufficient evidence of “other serious bodily harm” where victim was unconcious for one day and hospitalized for one week); (supreme court stated in dicta that “[ajrguably, ‘great bodily harm’ is inflicted if one knocks someone out briefly”).
- State v. Bridgeforth 357 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Bridgeforth 357 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1984