Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc., 346 N.W.2d 657.

62 citing documents.

Re: Expulsion Appeal File 22-04-E on behalf of W. M. from East Central Public Schools 2580. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
If an event has occurred while an appeal is pending, and if the event makes “a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of effective relief impossible, the appeal will be dismissed as moot.” In re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc., see also Housing & Redevelopment Auth.
In re the Marriage of: Emily Kay Stilwagon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-105 (Minn. App. 1988) (stating that an appeal of an issue will be dismissed as moot if the harm has been alleviated or it is impossible to award relief); In re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc. , (stating if, during appeal, events occur that makes decision on merits unnecessary or award of effective relief impossible, the appeal “will be dismissed as moot.”).
Jennifer Schroeder, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc.
City of Shoreview, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
If an event occurs after the district court ha s made a decision or entered judgment that makes “a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of effective relief impossible, the appeal will be dismissed as moot.” In re Inspection of Minnes ota Auto Specialties, Inc. , see also Housing & Redevelopment Auth.
Heritage Bank, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
If, pending an appeal, an event occurs which makes a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of effective re lief impossible, the appeal will be dismissed as moot.” In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc.
Marriage of Mattson v. Mattson 903 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marriage of Mattson v. Mattson 903 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An issue on appeal is moot if, during the appeal, “an event occurs making a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of relief impossible.” (citing In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc. , ).
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
E.g., In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc.
Szarzynski v. Szarzynski 732 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Szarzynski v. Szarzynski 732 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc.
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Midway Massage, Inc. 695 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Midway Massage, Inc. 695 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“It is well established that this court will hear only live controversies.” In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc.
Murray v. Puls 690 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Murray v. Puls 690 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(quoting In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc., ).
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Sunfish Lake 659 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Sunfish Lake 659 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc., (citations omitted).
Chaney v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 641 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Chaney v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 641 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Schiff v. Griffin 639 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Schiff v. Griffin 639 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Matson v. Matson 638 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Matson v. Matson 638 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(citing In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc., ) (for the proposition that an appeal of an issue will be dismissed as moot if the harm has been alleviated or it is impossible to award relief).
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
This court will “hear only live controversies and will not pass on the merits of a particular question merely for the purpose of setting precedent.” In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc.
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See, e.g., In re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc., (stating if, during appeal, event occurs making decision on merits unnecessary or award of effective relief impossible, appeal “will be dismissed as moot”).
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc. 606 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc. 606 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re Senty-Haugen 583 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1998
In Re Senty-Haugen 583 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1998
See, In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc.
Marriage of Weigel v. Miller 574 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Weigel v. Miller 574 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc.
In Re Paternity of BJH 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
A.J.S. v. M.T.H. 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re Paternity of BJH 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See In re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc., (during appeal, if an event occurs making a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of relief impossible, appeal "will be dismissed as moot"); Weinzierl v. Lien, 296 Minn. 539 , (generally, only final rulings are appealable).
A.J.S. v. M.T.H. 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See In re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc., (during appeal, if an event occurs making a decision on the merits unnecessary or an award of relief impossible, appeal “will be dismissed as moot”); Weinzierl v. Lien, 296 Minn. 539 , (generally, only final rulings are appealable).
Arbitration Between Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local No. 320 v. County of Carver 571 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Arbitration Between Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local No. 320 v. County of Carver 571 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wall v. Fair View Hospital & Healthcare Services 568 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wall v. Fair View Hospital & Healthcare Services 568 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc., (court considers events that occur while appeal is pending and may render case moot).
Everest Development, Ltd. v. City of Roseville 566 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Everest Development, Ltd. v. City of Roseville 566 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In re Inspection of Minnesota Auto Specialties, Inc.
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc., St.
Star Tribune v. BD. OF EDUC., SP. SCHOOL 507 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Star Tribune v. BD. OF EDUC., SP. SCHOOL 507 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
200, 201 , 24 L.Ed.2d 214 (1969) (per curiam) (court will only decide questions with real consequences); In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc., (same).
In Re the Welfare of A.M.P. 507 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the Welfare of A.M.P. 507 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In re Inspection of Minn. Auto Specialties, Inc.