Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tester v. Jefferson Lines, 358 N.W.2d 143.
-
Jay D. Demars, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Looking first at the phone conversation, as DEED correctly identifies, this court has stated that employers have “a right to expect [employees] to refrain from uttering unprovoked obscenities at management personnel.” rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
-
Dennis Field, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, e.g., Montgomery v. F & M Marquette Nat’l Bank, 605 (Minn. App. 1986) (reasoning that employee was insubordinate by saying to supervisor, “You don’t know what the hell you’re talking about”), rev. denied (Minn. June 13, 1986); (stating that “employer had a right to expect Tester to refrain from uttering unprovoked obscenities at management personnel”), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
-
Eric Petersen, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
ng finding of misconduct based on 7 evidence that employee walked off job despite supervisor’s instruction to remain) ; Montgomery v. F & M Marquette Nat ’l Bank, , 603, 605 (Minn. App. 1986) (reasoning that employee was insubordinate by saying to supervisor, “You don’t know what the hell you’re talking about”), review denied (Minn. June 13, 1986); ( stating that “ employer had a right to expect Tester to refrain from uttering unprovoked obscenities at management personnel”), review denied (Minn
- Denny v. Minneapolis American Indian Center 524 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Denny v. Minneapolis American Indian Center 524 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Markel v. City of Circle Pines 465 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Markel v. City of Circle Pines
465 N.W.2d 408
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
On appeal, we will review the Commissioner’s representative’s decision,' rather than the referee’ pet.
- Meehan v. Lull Corp. 466 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Meehan v. Lull Corp. 466 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc. 438 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc. 438 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Gradine v. College of St. Scholastica 426 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Gradine v. College of St. Scholastica 426 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Souder v. Ziegler, Inc., Buhl Location 424 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Souder v. Ziegler, Inc., Buhl Location 424 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- McCoy v. Spicer Off-Highway Axle Division 412 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Huling v. Stemm Transfer & Storage, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Huling v. Stemm Transfer & Storage, Inc.
411 N.W.2d 246
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
which also involved a strike situation.
- Tuckerman Optical Corp. v. Thoeny 407 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Tuckerman Optical Corp. v. Thoeny 407 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Christianson v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co. 404 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Christianson v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co. 404 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Minnesota Boxed Meats, Inc. v. Zadworny 404 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Minnesota Boxed Meats, Inc. v. Zadworny 404 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Norman v. Rosemount, Inc. 383 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Norman v. Rosemount, Inc. 383 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Deering v. Unitog Rental Services 381 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Deering v. Unitog Rental Services 381 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- McKee v. Cub Foods, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
McKee v. Cub Foods, Inc.
380 N.W.2d 233
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
However, our review is limited to considering the Commissioner’s representative’s decision rather than the referee’
- Willrich v. Top Temporary, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Willrich v. Top Temporary, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Abbey v. Contract Programming Specialists, Inc. 377 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Abbey v. Contract Programming Specialists, Inc. 377 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Oman v. Daig Corp. 375 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Oman v. Daig Corp.
375 N.W.2d 533
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Respondent contends this case does not fall under Windsperger because “the hotheaded incident exception has never been applied to a physical confrontation.”