Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Novick v. Novick, 366 N.W.2d 330.
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(affirming district court’s conclusion that “undocumented, unsecured” intra-family “loans” were gifts); (concluding that, when evidence regarding transfer consists almost entirely of oral testimony, we can disturb district court’s d
- Marriage of McConnell v. McConnell 710 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Marriage of McConnell v. McConnell 710 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Gatfield v. Gatfield 682 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Gatfield v. Gatfield 682 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Maeder v. Maeder 480 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Maeder v. Maeder 480 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- LaValle v. LaValle 430 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- LaValle v. LaValle 430 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Marriage of Bury v. Bury 416 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Bury v. Bury 416 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Nelson v. Nelson 411 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Marriage of Nelson v. Nelson
411 N.W.2d 868
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
joint venture approached in same manner as valuation of withdrawing partner’s interest); (valuation of vocational rehabilitation business by the respondent’s expert under adjusted book value approach upheld when the appellant’s expert valuation under capitalization approach effectively restricted the respondent’s future employment); (valuation of the respondent’s stock in privately owned brokerage firm at higher rate upheld when the respondent had controlling interest in the firm and when valuat
- Marriage of Kvenild v. Kvenild 410 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Kvenild v. Kvenild 410 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 408 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 408 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Thedens v. Thedens 400 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Thedens v. Thedens 400 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Doherty v. Doherty 388 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Doherty v. Doherty 388 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Smolecki v. Smolecki 386 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Smolecki v. Smolecki 386 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Ryan v. Ryan 383 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Ryan v. Ryan 383 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Rosenberg v. Rosenberg 379 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Rosenberg v. Rosenberg 379 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Nemitz v. Nemitz 376 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Marriage of Nemitz v. Nemitz
376 N.W.2d 243
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
An award should not be disturbed absent clear abuse of discretion.”
- Marriage of Brockman v. Brockman 373 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Brockman v. Brockman 373 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985