Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Anderson, 370 N.W.2d 703.

22 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
D-6 medical personnel —demonstrating the severity of the harm to the victim or the lasting effect on the victim.3 3 See, 710 (Minn. 1978) (concluding “other serious bodily harm” occurred when victim testified she had ongoing numbness in teeth and treating physicians testified about injuries); - 06 (Minn. App. 1985) (concluding “other serious bodily harm” occurred where “surgical scar remain[ed] a permanent reminder to the victim which extend[ed] from her lower [abdomen] to her upper chest”), rev
Abdullahi Aden Ibrahim v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Abdullahi Aden Ibrahim v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding that the jury could have determined that the liver laceration suffered by the victim was an injury that constituted a high probability of death because a physician testified that it was a life-threatening injury), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Bradford Cain Dopkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bradford Cain Dopkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding that a long scar running the length of the victim’s upper body, which was still present two and one half years after the injury was inflicted, constituted serious permanent disfigurement), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See, e.g. , State v. Barner , State v. Anderson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
29, 1987); −07 (Minn. App. 1985) (affirming upward departure involving repeated be atings and stamping of victim’s head), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Michael Aleman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Patrick Michael Aleman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(concluding that the following injuries constituted other serious bodily harm: loss of consciousness, numbness in her leg for several weeks, dizziness and headaches until just before trial, and numbness in her teeth at trial); (concluding that the following injuries constituted other serious bodily harm: “a lacerated liver, a laceration on her head which required stitches, bruises, other head injuries which caused lapses of consciousness, and a long scar”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Quintin Deshun Dye 871 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Quintin Deshun Dye 871 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (concluding that victim’s injuries, including swollen head making eating difficult for three days, multiple stab wounds that left scars, and injury to his hand, were encompassed by phrase “other serious bodily harm”); (stating that, “taken as a whole,” victim’s injuries, including lacerated liver, head laceration requiring stitches, bruises, other head injuries causing lapses of consciousness, and a long scar running length of upper body constituted “other serious bodily harm”), review deni
State v. Barner 510 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1993
State v. Barner 510 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1993
for rev. denied (Minn.1985); (Minn.App.
State v. Gerald 486 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Gerald 486 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
17, 1987); (single scar running the length of victim’s upper body qualifies as serious permanent disfigurement), pet.
State v. Wickstrom 405 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Wickstrom 405 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-51 (Minn.1985) (affirming double departure, court noted that victim’s four-year-old daughter was present during assault); pet.
State v. Currie 400 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Currie 400 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Sturm 391 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sturm 391 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(prolonged beating and stamping on victim’s head and body is particularly cruel); (repeated stabbing with a butter knife is particularly cruel); (stabbing someone 23 times is particularly cruel)