Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Martin v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 353 N.W.2d 202.

32 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Safety, (stating that “ even a single objective indication of intoxication may be sufficient, depending upon the circumstances in each case”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marsha Katherine Millonig v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Marsha Katherine Millonig v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Richard Montonye v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jason Richard Montonye v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Safety, (noting that “there are numerous signs indicating a person is under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and that an opinion on that condition can be reached without presence of all of the signs”); cf. Johnson v. Comm’r of Pub.
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Anthony Hartshorn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lee Weseman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lee Weseman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Anthony Hartshorn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Safety, d 202, 204 (Minn. App. 1984) (emphasis added), the particular fact of red and watery eyes is, by itself, insufficient to support reasonable suspicion of intoxication.
Heuton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 541 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Heuton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 541 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safety, (reiterating that “it is fundamental that each case must be decided on its own facts and circumstances”).
Holm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Holm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Commissioner of Public Safety v. Shewchuk 412 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Commissioner of Public Safety v. Shewchuk 412 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shull v. Commissioner of Public Safety 398 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Shull v. Commissioner of Public Safety 398 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Grohoski 390 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Grohoski 390 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“[Ejven a single objective indication of intoxication may be sufficient, depending upon the circumstances of each case.” ().
Musgjerd v. Commissioner of Public Safety 384 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Explained Musgjerd v. Commissioner of Public Safety 384 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Holtz, d at 365 ; however, in Martin v. Commissioner of *574 Public Safety, we explained that, depending upon the circumstances of the case, a single objective indication of intoxication may be sufficient, but cautioned that each case must be decided on its own facts and circumstances, without regard to any formula.
Stiles v. Commissioner of Public Safety 369 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Stiles v. Commissioner of Public Safety 369 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clow v. Commissioner of Public Safety 362 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clow v. Commissioner of Public Safety 362 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
this court considered the sufficiency of probable cause and concluded that probable cause is not reducible to a mechanical or numerical equation.
Keane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 360 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Keane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 360 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
: The cases cited in Holtz decision establish that there are numerous signs indicating a person is under the influence of an intoxicating liquor, and that an opinion on that condition can be reached without presence of all of the signs.
Vertina v. Commissioner of Public Safety 356 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Vertina v. Commissioner of Public Safety 356 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
: [TJhere are numerous signs indicating a person is under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and * * * an opinion on that condition can be reached without presence of all of the signs.
Nohre v. Commissioner of Public Safety 355 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nohre v. Commissioner of Public Safety 355 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1984