Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Nash v. Nash, 388 N.W.2d 777.

23 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Jerry Arthur McDonald, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Cf. Nash v. Nash , (cre diting wife’s tracing when she received an inheritance and produced receipts for home improvements made two weeks after receiving inheritance), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Patricia Rose Whipps, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But “[t]he [district] court’s exercise of its discretion in valuing and distributing an asset should be supported by either clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the court.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Simply routing funds through a joint bank account “does not transform non-marital property into marital property.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
RISK EX REL. MILLER v. Stark 787 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
RISK EX REL. MILLER v. Stark 787 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“Simply routing the funds through a joint account does not transform non-marital property into marital property.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Marriage of Stich v. Stich 435 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Stich v. Stich 435 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
“The denial of fees may be an abuse of discretion when there is a wide disparity in the financial resources of the parties.” ( pet.
LaValle v. LaValle 430 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
LaValle v. LaValle 430 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Griffith v. Griffith 415 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Griffith v. Griffith 415 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Although Charles put proceeds from the sale of his property in the parties’ joint checking accounts “[sjimply routing the funds through a joint account ‘does not transform non-marital property into marital property.’ ” rev. denied, August 20, 1986
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 412 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 412 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Therefore, the court made an additional potential award based on this court’s pet.
Marriage of Petschel v. Petschel 406 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Petschel v. Petschel 406 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Worden v. Worden 403 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Worden v. Worden 403 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 392 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 392 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by