Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. DeWald, 463 N.W.2d 741.
- State v. Zanter 535 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1995
- State v. Zanter 535 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1995
- State v. Washington 521 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1994
- State v. Washington 521 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1994
- State v. Stewart 514 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 1994
- State v. Stewart 514 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 1994
- State v. Lembke 509 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State v. Lembke
509 N.W.2d 182
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The “plain view” doctrine allows police, once lawfully in a position to see incriminatory evidence, to seize that evidence if its incriminating nature is “immediately apparent.”
- State v. Lunsford 507 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Lunsford 507 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Miller
488 N.W.2d 235
Minn. 1992
The jury determines the credibility and weight to be given the testimony of witnesses.’ ().
- State v. Bickham 485 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1992
- State v. Bickham 485 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1992
- State v. Olson 482 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Olson
482 N.W.2d 212
Minn. 1992
See, -68 (Minn.1991), , 748 n. 2 (Minn.1990), relying on Scott v. United States, 436 U.S. 128 , 98 S.Ct.
- State v. Angulo 471 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
State v. Angulo
471 N.W.2d 570
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(proper closing argument should focus on evidence admitted and reasonable inferences and not be calculated to inflame passions of jury or prejudice jury against defendant).